Abstract
Reflexivity – the capacity of an agent, structure or process to change in the light of reflection on its performance – has attracted widespread support among political theorists as a virtue for environmental governance. Dryzek argues that a distinctively ecological form of reflexivity becomes crucial for governing in the Anthropocene. But there remains a need to clarify the conceptual scope of ecological reflexivity and to ascertain whether it has distinctive analytical value. A new conceptual framework for ecological reflexivity is outlined, comprising three components: recognition, rethinking and response. Through a comparative analysis of reflexivity and four related concepts – adaptive and transformative governance, experimental governance, social learning and anticipatory governance – ecological reflexivity is shown to be especially well equipped to take account of political contestation over the nature and direction of change required to respond to ecological risks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1145-1166 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Environmental Politics |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 10 Nov 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ecological reflexivity: characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver