Ecosystem approach and ocean management

Mario Vierros, Ian D. Cresswell, Peter Bridgewater, Anthony D.M. Smith

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of an ecosystem approach has arisen largely as a management response to decline in biodiversity and natural resources, which single species management and primarily sectoral approaches had failed to stem. Because of its integrated nature, an ecosystem approach was seen as a way to better manage multiple impacts on environments holistically while maximizing long-term economic, social, and cultural bene benefits. The ecosystem approach also provides for the involvement of a wide range of users and other stakeholders in the management of a spatial area and resources, thus improving coordination and integration in activities. Many different ‘ecosystem approaches’ exist, ranging from traditional/indigenous approaches to those more recently adopted by Western societies. The theory of how to manage using the ecosystem as the planning framework is still in its infancy and there is no one correct way to implement an ecosystem approach. However, certain principles apply to all current approaches. Perhaps the two bestknown concepts are the complementary ones in use by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Garcia et al., 2003) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (UNESCO, 2000; Shepherd, 2008) with related biodiversity conventions. In practice, however, the most widely implemented approaches are in integrated coastal zone (sometimes area) management (ICZM) and integrated water resources management (IWRM), also sometimes expressed as river basin management (RBM). While not formally called ‘ecosystem approaches’, they espouse the use of a whole or integrated system as the base layer for all planning and management. Approaches to management that use the ecosystem as a basis have become a central concept in the implementation of a number of international and regional agreements, such as those within the CBD (cf. CBD, 2000) and the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO, 2013), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR; cf. Fabra and Gascón, 2008), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), and the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) – among others.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationOcean Sustainability in the 21st Century
EditorsSalvatore Arico'
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter6
Pages127-145
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781316164624
ISBN (Print)9781107100138
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecosystem approach
Food and Agricultural Organization
ocean
biodiversity
basin management
ecosystem
UNESCO
United Nations
coastal zone
convention
marine environment
stakeholder
natural resource
river basin
fishery
stem
agriculture
food
resource
economics

Cite this

Vierros, M., Cresswell, I. D., Bridgewater, P., & Smith, A. D. M. (2015). Ecosystem approach and ocean management. In S. Arico' (Ed.), Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century (pp. 127-145). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009
Vierros, Mario ; Cresswell, Ian D. ; Bridgewater, Peter ; Smith, Anthony D.M. / Ecosystem approach and ocean management. Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century. editor / Salvatore Arico'. Cambridge University Press, 2015. pp. 127-145
@inbook{1f91d6903e6d4bc68db92946a65d4759,
title = "Ecosystem approach and ocean management",
abstract = "The concept of an ecosystem approach has arisen largely as a management response to decline in biodiversity and natural resources, which single species management and primarily sectoral approaches had failed to stem. Because of its integrated nature, an ecosystem approach was seen as a way to better manage multiple impacts on environments holistically while maximizing long-term economic, social, and cultural bene benefits. The ecosystem approach also provides for the involvement of a wide range of users and other stakeholders in the management of a spatial area and resources, thus improving coordination and integration in activities. Many different ‘ecosystem approaches’ exist, ranging from traditional/indigenous approaches to those more recently adopted by Western societies. The theory of how to manage using the ecosystem as the planning framework is still in its infancy and there is no one correct way to implement an ecosystem approach. However, certain principles apply to all current approaches. Perhaps the two bestknown concepts are the complementary ones in use by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Garcia et al., 2003) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (UNESCO, 2000; Shepherd, 2008) with related biodiversity conventions. In practice, however, the most widely implemented approaches are in integrated coastal zone (sometimes area) management (ICZM) and integrated water resources management (IWRM), also sometimes expressed as river basin management (RBM). While not formally called ‘ecosystem approaches’, they espouse the use of a whole or integrated system as the base layer for all planning and management. Approaches to management that use the ecosystem as a basis have become a central concept in the implementation of a number of international and regional agreements, such as those within the CBD (cf. CBD, 2000) and the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO, 2013), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR; cf. Fabra and Gasc{\'o}n, 2008), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), and the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) – among others.",
keywords = "Ecosystem, Ecosystems, Marine food",
author = "Mario Vierros and Cresswell, {Ian D.} and Peter Bridgewater and Smith, {Anthony D.M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781107100138",
pages = "127--145",
editor = "Salvatore Arico'",
booktitle = "Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Vierros, M, Cresswell, ID, Bridgewater, P & Smith, ADM 2015, Ecosystem approach and ocean management. in S Arico' (ed.), Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press, pp. 127-145. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009

Ecosystem approach and ocean management. / Vierros, Mario; Cresswell, Ian D.; Bridgewater, Peter; Smith, Anthony D.M.

Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century. ed. / Salvatore Arico'. Cambridge University Press, 2015. p. 127-145.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Ecosystem approach and ocean management

AU - Vierros, Mario

AU - Cresswell, Ian D.

AU - Bridgewater, Peter

AU - Smith, Anthony D.M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The concept of an ecosystem approach has arisen largely as a management response to decline in biodiversity and natural resources, which single species management and primarily sectoral approaches had failed to stem. Because of its integrated nature, an ecosystem approach was seen as a way to better manage multiple impacts on environments holistically while maximizing long-term economic, social, and cultural bene benefits. The ecosystem approach also provides for the involvement of a wide range of users and other stakeholders in the management of a spatial area and resources, thus improving coordination and integration in activities. Many different ‘ecosystem approaches’ exist, ranging from traditional/indigenous approaches to those more recently adopted by Western societies. The theory of how to manage using the ecosystem as the planning framework is still in its infancy and there is no one correct way to implement an ecosystem approach. However, certain principles apply to all current approaches. Perhaps the two bestknown concepts are the complementary ones in use by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Garcia et al., 2003) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (UNESCO, 2000; Shepherd, 2008) with related biodiversity conventions. In practice, however, the most widely implemented approaches are in integrated coastal zone (sometimes area) management (ICZM) and integrated water resources management (IWRM), also sometimes expressed as river basin management (RBM). While not formally called ‘ecosystem approaches’, they espouse the use of a whole or integrated system as the base layer for all planning and management. Approaches to management that use the ecosystem as a basis have become a central concept in the implementation of a number of international and regional agreements, such as those within the CBD (cf. CBD, 2000) and the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO, 2013), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR; cf. Fabra and Gascón, 2008), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), and the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) – among others.

AB - The concept of an ecosystem approach has arisen largely as a management response to decline in biodiversity and natural resources, which single species management and primarily sectoral approaches had failed to stem. Because of its integrated nature, an ecosystem approach was seen as a way to better manage multiple impacts on environments holistically while maximizing long-term economic, social, and cultural bene benefits. The ecosystem approach also provides for the involvement of a wide range of users and other stakeholders in the management of a spatial area and resources, thus improving coordination and integration in activities. Many different ‘ecosystem approaches’ exist, ranging from traditional/indigenous approaches to those more recently adopted by Western societies. The theory of how to manage using the ecosystem as the planning framework is still in its infancy and there is no one correct way to implement an ecosystem approach. However, certain principles apply to all current approaches. Perhaps the two bestknown concepts are the complementary ones in use by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (Garcia et al., 2003) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (UNESCO, 2000; Shepherd, 2008) with related biodiversity conventions. In practice, however, the most widely implemented approaches are in integrated coastal zone (sometimes area) management (ICZM) and integrated water resources management (IWRM), also sometimes expressed as river basin management (RBM). While not formally called ‘ecosystem approaches’, they espouse the use of a whole or integrated system as the base layer for all planning and management. Approaches to management that use the ecosystem as a basis have become a central concept in the implementation of a number of international and regional agreements, such as those within the CBD (cf. CBD, 2000) and the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO, 2013), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR; cf. Fabra and Gascón, 2008), the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR), and the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) – among others.

KW - Ecosystem

KW - Ecosystems

KW - Marine food

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954169598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/ecosystem-approach-ocean-management

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781107100138

SP - 127

EP - 145

BT - Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century

A2 - Arico', Salvatore

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Vierros M, Cresswell ID, Bridgewater P, Smith ADM. Ecosystem approach and ocean management. In Arico' S, editor, Ocean Sustainability in the 21st Century. Cambridge University Press. 2015. p. 127-145 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316164624.009