Editorial

Democratic Theory - Summer 2015

Jean Paul Gagnon, Mark Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

This general issue of Democratic Theory begins with an important contribution by George Vasilev (La Trobe University) that reflects on Chantal Mouffe’s notion of democratic agonism. Mouffe has, primarily as part of her critique of deliberative democracy, asserted that consensus necessarily creates exclusion. What is important is that democratic dialogue remains open-ended. For her this means that democrats should view themselves as adversaries rather than antagonists who bring discussions to a close. Vasilev critiques Mouffe’s assertion by arguing that she holds a one-sided understanding of consensus that creates a less credible form of adversarial politics. By crafting a “norm of consensus”, Vasilev thus demonstrates that consensus formation can ensure the very condition of democratic freedom itself. In doing this, Vasilev’s argument brings a fresh perspective to ongoing debates in deliberative and agonistic democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
Number of pages3
JournalDemocratic Theory
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Fingerprint

deliberative democracy
exclusion
dialogue
democracy
politics
Democratic Theory
Democracy
Agonism
Antagonist
Chantal Mouffe
Crafting
Exclusion
Deliberative Democracy

Cite this

Gagnon, Jean Paul ; Chou, Mark. / Editorial : Democratic Theory - Summer 2015. In: Democratic Theory. 2015 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 1-3.
@article{0c6523ec8dba4b5cb5196078c73ce7af,
title = "Editorial: Democratic Theory - Summer 2015",
abstract = "This general issue of Democratic Theory begins with an important contribution by George Vasilev (La Trobe University) that reflects on Chantal Mouffe’s notion of democratic agonism. Mouffe has, primarily as part of her critique of deliberative democracy, asserted that consensus necessarily creates exclusion. What is important is that democratic dialogue remains open-ended. For her this means that democrats should view themselves as adversaries rather than antagonists who bring discussions to a close. Vasilev critiques Mouffe’s assertion by arguing that she holds a one-sided understanding of consensus that creates a less credible form of adversarial politics. By crafting a “norm of consensus”, Vasilev thus demonstrates that consensus formation can ensure the very condition of democratic freedom itself. In doing this, Vasilev’s argument brings a fresh perspective to ongoing debates in deliberative and agonistic democracy.",
keywords = "Democracy, Democratic Theory, Democratization",
author = "Gagnon, {Jean Paul} and Mark Chou",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/dt.2015.020101",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--3",
journal = "Democratic Theory",
issn = "1838-8795",
number = "1",

}

Editorial : Democratic Theory - Summer 2015. / Gagnon, Jean Paul; Chou, Mark.

In: Democratic Theory, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.06.2015, p. 1-3.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorial

T2 - Democratic Theory - Summer 2015

AU - Gagnon, Jean Paul

AU - Chou, Mark

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - This general issue of Democratic Theory begins with an important contribution by George Vasilev (La Trobe University) that reflects on Chantal Mouffe’s notion of democratic agonism. Mouffe has, primarily as part of her critique of deliberative democracy, asserted that consensus necessarily creates exclusion. What is important is that democratic dialogue remains open-ended. For her this means that democrats should view themselves as adversaries rather than antagonists who bring discussions to a close. Vasilev critiques Mouffe’s assertion by arguing that she holds a one-sided understanding of consensus that creates a less credible form of adversarial politics. By crafting a “norm of consensus”, Vasilev thus demonstrates that consensus formation can ensure the very condition of democratic freedom itself. In doing this, Vasilev’s argument brings a fresh perspective to ongoing debates in deliberative and agonistic democracy.

AB - This general issue of Democratic Theory begins with an important contribution by George Vasilev (La Trobe University) that reflects on Chantal Mouffe’s notion of democratic agonism. Mouffe has, primarily as part of her critique of deliberative democracy, asserted that consensus necessarily creates exclusion. What is important is that democratic dialogue remains open-ended. For her this means that democrats should view themselves as adversaries rather than antagonists who bring discussions to a close. Vasilev critiques Mouffe’s assertion by arguing that she holds a one-sided understanding of consensus that creates a less credible form of adversarial politics. By crafting a “norm of consensus”, Vasilev thus demonstrates that consensus formation can ensure the very condition of democratic freedom itself. In doing this, Vasilev’s argument brings a fresh perspective to ongoing debates in deliberative and agonistic democracy.

KW - Democracy

KW - Democratic Theory

KW - Democratization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047376053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/editorial-1359600348

U2 - 10.3167/dt.2015.020101

DO - 10.3167/dt.2015.020101

M3 - Editorial

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 3

JO - Democratic Theory

JF - Democratic Theory

SN - 1838-8795

IS - 1

ER -