Editorial

Democratic Theory - Summer 2018

Jean Paul Gagnon, Mark Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

This issue begins with Peter Strandbrink’s argument that “standard liberal democratic theory should be pressed significantly harder to recognize the lexical and conceptual fact that civic political and cognitive participation in mass liberal democracies belong to different theoretical species.” It is by conflating both of these theoretical species, which Strandbrink sees as the dominant tendency in contemporary democratic theory, that we inhibit our ability to critically evaluate “epistocratic theoretical registers.” Further unsettling is Stranbrink’s view that, once separated from each other, neither the theories of civic political or cognitive participation offer much help in dealing with the rise of “alt-facts” or “post-truth” in liberal democratic societies today
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-7
Number of pages3
JournalDemocratic Theory
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

participation
democracy
ability
society
Civics
Participation
Democratic Theory
Liberal Democracy
Rise

Cite this

Gagnon, Jean Paul ; Chou, Mark. / Editorial : Democratic Theory - Summer 2018. In: Democratic Theory. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 5-7.
@article{4199b76d42f2421c982087288e0e2c40,
title = "Editorial: Democratic Theory - Summer 2018",
abstract = "This issue begins with Peter Strandbrink’s argument that “standard liberal democratic theory should be pressed significantly harder to recognize the lexical and conceptual fact that civic political and cognitive participation in mass liberal democracies belong to different theoretical species.” It is by conflating both of these theoretical species, which Strandbrink sees as the dominant tendency in contemporary democratic theory, that we inhibit our ability to critically evaluate “epistocratic theoretical registers.” Further unsettling is Stranbrink’s view that, once separated from each other, neither the theories of civic political or cognitive participation offer much help in dealing with the rise of “alt-facts” or “post-truth” in liberal democratic societies today",
author = "Gagnon, {Jean Paul} and Mark Chou",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/dt.2018.050101",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "5--7",
journal = "Democratic Theory",
issn = "1838-8795",
number = "1",

}

Editorial : Democratic Theory - Summer 2018. / Gagnon, Jean Paul; Chou, Mark.

In: Democratic Theory, Vol. 5, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 5-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Editorial

T2 - Democratic Theory - Summer 2018

AU - Gagnon, Jean Paul

AU - Chou, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This issue begins with Peter Strandbrink’s argument that “standard liberal democratic theory should be pressed significantly harder to recognize the lexical and conceptual fact that civic political and cognitive participation in mass liberal democracies belong to different theoretical species.” It is by conflating both of these theoretical species, which Strandbrink sees as the dominant tendency in contemporary democratic theory, that we inhibit our ability to critically evaluate “epistocratic theoretical registers.” Further unsettling is Stranbrink’s view that, once separated from each other, neither the theories of civic political or cognitive participation offer much help in dealing with the rise of “alt-facts” or “post-truth” in liberal democratic societies today

AB - This issue begins with Peter Strandbrink’s argument that “standard liberal democratic theory should be pressed significantly harder to recognize the lexical and conceptual fact that civic political and cognitive participation in mass liberal democracies belong to different theoretical species.” It is by conflating both of these theoretical species, which Strandbrink sees as the dominant tendency in contemporary democratic theory, that we inhibit our ability to critically evaluate “epistocratic theoretical registers.” Further unsettling is Stranbrink’s view that, once separated from each other, neither the theories of civic political or cognitive participation offer much help in dealing with the rise of “alt-facts” or “post-truth” in liberal democratic societies today

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047319722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/editorial-37086

U2 - 10.3167/dt.2018.050101

DO - 10.3167/dt.2018.050101

M3 - Editorial

VL - 5

SP - 5

EP - 7

JO - Democratic Theory

JF - Democratic Theory

SN - 1838-8795

IS - 1

ER -