Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices

Joachim Szécsényi, Stephen Campbell, Björn Broge, Gunter Laux, Sara Willms, Michel Wensing, Katja Goetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract


Background: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety.


Methods: In a before–after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group’s second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100.


Results: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group.


Interpretation: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1326-1333
Number of pages8
JournalCMAJ
Volume183
Issue number18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Primary Health Care
Practice Management
Safety
Policy Making
Program Evaluation
Germany

Cite this

Szécsényi, J., Campbell, S., Broge, B., Laux, G., Willms, S., Wensing, M., & Goetz, K. (2011). Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices. CMAJ, 183(18), 1326-1333. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110412
Szécsényi, Joachim ; Campbell, Stephen ; Broge, Björn ; Laux, Gunter ; Willms, Sara ; Wensing, Michel ; Goetz, Katja. / Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices. In: CMAJ. 2011 ; Vol. 183, No. 18. pp. 1326-1333.
@article{98a436b8722142ff9639d1ea3b93c489,
title = "Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices",
abstract = "Background: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety. Methods: In a before–after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group’s second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100. Results: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group. Interpretation: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.",
author = "Joachim Sz{\'e}cs{\'e}nyi and Stephen Campbell and Bj{\"o}rn Broge and Gunter Laux and Sara Willms and Michel Wensing and Katja Goetz",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1503/cmaj.110412",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
pages = "1326--1333",
journal = "CMAJ",
issn = "0820-3946",
publisher = "Canadian Medical Association",
number = "18",

}

Szécsényi, J, Campbell, S, Broge, B, Laux, G, Willms, S, Wensing, M & Goetz, K 2011, 'Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices', CMAJ, vol. 183, no. 18, pp. 1326-1333. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110412

Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices. / Szécsényi, Joachim; Campbell, Stephen; Broge, Björn; Laux, Gunter; Willms, Sara; Wensing, Michel; Goetz, Katja.

In: CMAJ, Vol. 183, No. 18, 2011, p. 1326-1333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices

AU - Szécsényi, Joachim

AU - Campbell, Stephen

AU - Broge, Björn

AU - Laux, Gunter

AU - Willms, Sara

AU - Wensing, Michel

AU - Goetz, Katja

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety. Methods: In a before–after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group’s second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100. Results: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group. Interpretation: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.

AB - Background: The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety. Methods: In a before–after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group’s second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100. Results: We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group. Interpretation: Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.

U2 - 10.1503/cmaj.110412

DO - 10.1503/cmaj.110412

M3 - Article

VL - 183

SP - 1326

EP - 1333

JO - CMAJ

JF - CMAJ

SN - 0820-3946

IS - 18

ER -

Szécsényi J, Campbell S, Broge B, Laux G, Willms S, Wensing M et al. Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices. CMAJ. 2011;183(18):1326-1333. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110412