Effects of different post-match recovery interventions on subsequent athlete hormonal state and game performance

Blair T Crewther, C.J. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)


We tested the effects of different post-match recovery interventions on the subsequent hormonal responses to a physical stress-test and game performance in professional rugby union players. On four occasions, participants (n = 12) completed a video session (1. h each) with accompanying coach feedback the day after a rugby union match. The interventions showed either video footage of player mistakes with negative coach feedback (NCF1) or player successes with positive feedback (PCF1). Both approaches were repeated (NCF2 and PCF2). In the following week, participants were assessed for their free testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) responses to a physical stress-test, pre-game T and game-ranked performance. The PFC1 and PCF2 approaches were both associated with significantly (p<0.01) greater free T (36% to 42%) responses to the stress-test when compared to NCF1 and NCF2 (16% to - 3%), respectively. The PCF interventions were also associated with higher (28% to 51%) pre-game T concentrations and superior game-ranked performances than the NCF approaches (p<0.01). In conclusion, the post-game presentation of specific video footage combined with different coach feedbacks appeared to influence the free hormonal state of rugby players and game performance several days later. Therefore, within the sporting context, future behaviour and performance might be modified through the use of simple psychological strategies. These data are applicable to generalised human stress responses and their modifiability by prior exposure to a stressor. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-475
Number of pages5
JournalPhysiology and Behavior
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of different post-match recovery interventions on subsequent athlete hormonal state and game performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this