Effects of selective forest harvesting best management practices on organic matter and invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt forest

Kate E. Smolders, Robert J. Rolls, Andrew J. Boulton, Ashley A. Webb, Fran Sheldon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Best management practices (BMPs) for forestry activities have been developed to mitigate the impacts of timber harvesting on stream ecosystems in New South Wales, Australia. These BMPs include selective harvesting within the catchment, exclusion of harvesting in riparian zones, and restrictions on harvesting and machinery operations during wet weather or on steep slopes. The few studies assessing the ecological effects of forestry BMPs have largely focussed on operations in temperate climates and are often based on a single pair of control and impact streams. But what are the effects in subtropical regions where climatic and hydrological variability may be greater? Are the effects of selective harvesting dependent on the proximity of harvesting to the locations of monitoring? We used a multiple paired-catchment study to assess effects of forestry BMPs on standing stocks of benthic coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) and densities of invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt catchments that were either harvested using BMPs (‘impact’) or unharvested (‘control’). CPOM and detritivores in three pools in each of the four streams were sampled multiple times before and after the impact catchments were harvested. Harvesting intensity and proximity of harvesting to stream monitoring sites differed between ‘impact’ catchments. Benthic CPOM was dominated by leaves and leaf fragments in all streams. There were no post-harvesting differences in CPOM composition, standing stocks of different CPOM fractions or densities of detritivorous stream invertebrates in two feeding groups (collector-gatherers and shredders) between stream pairs despite differences in the proximity (minimum of ∼50 m and 1.6 km) of harvesting to monitoring sites. We conclude that relative to matched control sites, selective forestry BMPs do not alter CPOM stocks and stream detritivore densities in this subtropical Australian eucalypt forest, implying that these BMPs are effective in mitigating effects of harvesting across similar subtropical forests.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)271-285
    Number of pages15
    JournalEcological Engineering
    Volume122
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2018

    Fingerprint

    best management practice
    Biological materials
    invertebrate
    organic matter
    particulate organic matter
    Catchments
    Forestry
    catchment
    forestry
    Monitoring
    monitoring
    draining
    effect
    Invertebrates
    timber harvesting
    subtropical region
    riparian zone
    biomass
    Timber
    machinery

    Cite this

    Smolders, Kate E. ; Rolls, Robert J. ; Boulton, Andrew J. ; Webb, Ashley A. ; Sheldon, Fran. / Effects of selective forest harvesting best management practices on organic matter and invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt forest. In: Ecological Engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 122. pp. 271-285.
    @article{06092c3b049047eea132fcaa1f42bda9,
    title = "Effects of selective forest harvesting best management practices on organic matter and invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt forest",
    abstract = "Best management practices (BMPs) for forestry activities have been developed to mitigate the impacts of timber harvesting on stream ecosystems in New South Wales, Australia. These BMPs include selective harvesting within the catchment, exclusion of harvesting in riparian zones, and restrictions on harvesting and machinery operations during wet weather or on steep slopes. The few studies assessing the ecological effects of forestry BMPs have largely focussed on operations in temperate climates and are often based on a single pair of control and impact streams. But what are the effects in subtropical regions where climatic and hydrological variability may be greater? Are the effects of selective harvesting dependent on the proximity of harvesting to the locations of monitoring? We used a multiple paired-catchment study to assess effects of forestry BMPs on standing stocks of benthic coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) and densities of invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt catchments that were either harvested using BMPs (‘impact’) or unharvested (‘control’). CPOM and detritivores in three pools in each of the four streams were sampled multiple times before and after the impact catchments were harvested. Harvesting intensity and proximity of harvesting to stream monitoring sites differed between ‘impact’ catchments. Benthic CPOM was dominated by leaves and leaf fragments in all streams. There were no post-harvesting differences in CPOM composition, standing stocks of different CPOM fractions or densities of detritivorous stream invertebrates in two feeding groups (collector-gatherers and shredders) between stream pairs despite differences in the proximity (minimum of ∼50 m and 1.6 km) of harvesting to monitoring sites. We conclude that relative to matched control sites, selective forestry BMPs do not alter CPOM stocks and stream detritivore densities in this subtropical Australian eucalypt forest, implying that these BMPs are effective in mitigating effects of harvesting across similar subtropical forests.",
    keywords = "Before-after control-impact design, Best management practices, Organic matter dynamics, Selective forest harvesting, Stream invertebrate ecology, Subtropical eucalypt forest",
    author = "Smolders, {Kate E.} and Rolls, {Robert J.} and Boulton, {Andrew J.} and Webb, {Ashley A.} and Fran Sheldon",
    year = "2018",
    month = "10",
    day = "15",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.010",
    language = "English",
    volume = "122",
    pages = "271--285",
    journal = "Ecological Engineering",
    issn = "0925-8574",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    Effects of selective forest harvesting best management practices on organic matter and invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt forest. / Smolders, Kate E.; Rolls, Robert J.; Boulton, Andrew J.; Webb, Ashley A.; Sheldon, Fran.

    In: Ecological Engineering, Vol. 122, 15.10.2018, p. 271-285.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Effects of selective forest harvesting best management practices on organic matter and invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt forest

    AU - Smolders, Kate E.

    AU - Rolls, Robert J.

    AU - Boulton, Andrew J.

    AU - Webb, Ashley A.

    AU - Sheldon, Fran

    PY - 2018/10/15

    Y1 - 2018/10/15

    N2 - Best management practices (BMPs) for forestry activities have been developed to mitigate the impacts of timber harvesting on stream ecosystems in New South Wales, Australia. These BMPs include selective harvesting within the catchment, exclusion of harvesting in riparian zones, and restrictions on harvesting and machinery operations during wet weather or on steep slopes. The few studies assessing the ecological effects of forestry BMPs have largely focussed on operations in temperate climates and are often based on a single pair of control and impact streams. But what are the effects in subtropical regions where climatic and hydrological variability may be greater? Are the effects of selective harvesting dependent on the proximity of harvesting to the locations of monitoring? We used a multiple paired-catchment study to assess effects of forestry BMPs on standing stocks of benthic coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) and densities of invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt catchments that were either harvested using BMPs (‘impact’) or unharvested (‘control’). CPOM and detritivores in three pools in each of the four streams were sampled multiple times before and after the impact catchments were harvested. Harvesting intensity and proximity of harvesting to stream monitoring sites differed between ‘impact’ catchments. Benthic CPOM was dominated by leaves and leaf fragments in all streams. There were no post-harvesting differences in CPOM composition, standing stocks of different CPOM fractions or densities of detritivorous stream invertebrates in two feeding groups (collector-gatherers and shredders) between stream pairs despite differences in the proximity (minimum of ∼50 m and 1.6 km) of harvesting to monitoring sites. We conclude that relative to matched control sites, selective forestry BMPs do not alter CPOM stocks and stream detritivore densities in this subtropical Australian eucalypt forest, implying that these BMPs are effective in mitigating effects of harvesting across similar subtropical forests.

    AB - Best management practices (BMPs) for forestry activities have been developed to mitigate the impacts of timber harvesting on stream ecosystems in New South Wales, Australia. These BMPs include selective harvesting within the catchment, exclusion of harvesting in riparian zones, and restrictions on harvesting and machinery operations during wet weather or on steep slopes. The few studies assessing the ecological effects of forestry BMPs have largely focussed on operations in temperate climates and are often based on a single pair of control and impact streams. But what are the effects in subtropical regions where climatic and hydrological variability may be greater? Are the effects of selective harvesting dependent on the proximity of harvesting to the locations of monitoring? We used a multiple paired-catchment study to assess effects of forestry BMPs on standing stocks of benthic coarse particulate organic matter (CPOM) and densities of invertebrate detritivores in streams draining subtropical eucalypt catchments that were either harvested using BMPs (‘impact’) or unharvested (‘control’). CPOM and detritivores in three pools in each of the four streams were sampled multiple times before and after the impact catchments were harvested. Harvesting intensity and proximity of harvesting to stream monitoring sites differed between ‘impact’ catchments. Benthic CPOM was dominated by leaves and leaf fragments in all streams. There were no post-harvesting differences in CPOM composition, standing stocks of different CPOM fractions or densities of detritivorous stream invertebrates in two feeding groups (collector-gatherers and shredders) between stream pairs despite differences in the proximity (minimum of ∼50 m and 1.6 km) of harvesting to monitoring sites. We conclude that relative to matched control sites, selective forestry BMPs do not alter CPOM stocks and stream detritivore densities in this subtropical Australian eucalypt forest, implying that these BMPs are effective in mitigating effects of harvesting across similar subtropical forests.

    KW - Before-after control-impact design

    KW - Best management practices

    KW - Organic matter dynamics

    KW - Selective forest harvesting

    KW - Stream invertebrate ecology

    KW - Subtropical eucalypt forest

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051801016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.010

    DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.08.010

    M3 - Article

    VL - 122

    SP - 271

    EP - 285

    JO - Ecological Engineering

    JF - Ecological Engineering

    SN - 0925-8574

    ER -