TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Althobaiti, Salman
AU - Kazantzis, Nikolaos
AU - Ofori-Asenso, Richard
AU - Romero, Lorena
AU - Fisher, Jane
AU - Mills, Kerry E.
AU - Liew, Danny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Background: : Evidence for the efficacy of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is urgently required. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in reducing the symptoms of PTSD. Methods: : Five databases were searched from inception until November 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of IPT in patients with PTSD symptoms. The reference lists of included studies were also hand searched. A random effects model was used to estimate changes in a clinician-administered PTSD scale, or self-reported symptoms. Results: : Of 509 screened abstracts, ten clinical trials (11 study arms) involving 755 patients with PTSD symptoms were included. Nine studies (10 study arms) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall standardized mean difference was -0.44 (CI: -0.69, -0.19), p = 0.0005. This represents a change in the clinically administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS) of approximately 12 points. IPT was not superior to other active controls, such as medication and non-IPT psychotherapies, but was significantly superior to passive controls, such as waiting list and educational pamphlets. Limitations: : Most studies modified the IPT protocol and did not comprehensively assess clinician fidelity to the protocol. The included studies generally had small sample sizes and were of limited quality. Conclusions: : IPT may be an effective treatment for PTSD, but clinical trials with larger sample sizes and improved methodology are required to confirm effects.
AB - Background: : Evidence for the efficacy of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is urgently required. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in reducing the symptoms of PTSD. Methods: : Five databases were searched from inception until November 2018 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy of IPT in patients with PTSD symptoms. The reference lists of included studies were also hand searched. A random effects model was used to estimate changes in a clinician-administered PTSD scale, or self-reported symptoms. Results: : Of 509 screened abstracts, ten clinical trials (11 study arms) involving 755 patients with PTSD symptoms were included. Nine studies (10 study arms) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall standardized mean difference was -0.44 (CI: -0.69, -0.19), p = 0.0005. This represents a change in the clinically administrated PTSD Scale (CAPS) of approximately 12 points. IPT was not superior to other active controls, such as medication and non-IPT psychotherapies, but was significantly superior to passive controls, such as waiting list and educational pamphlets. Limitations: : Most studies modified the IPT protocol and did not comprehensively assess clinician fidelity to the protocol. The included studies generally had small sample sizes and were of limited quality. Conclusions: : IPT may be an effective treatment for PTSD, but clinical trials with larger sample sizes and improved methodology are required to confirm effects.
KW - Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Posttraumatic stress disorder
KW - Systematic review
KW - Trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077644053&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.12.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 32056763
AN - SCOPUS:85077644053
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 264
SP - 286
EP - 294
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -