Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia

Lorana BARTELS, Marietta Martinovic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Electronic monitoring (EM) has been introduced in over 30 countries around the world. In most English-speaking countries, it has moved well beyond experimental status and become a regularly applied penal measure. Australia has been lagging behind this world trend, as EM has yet not become dominant in our correctional landscape. This is even though sanctions that utilise radio-frequency and/or global positioning systems (GPS) monitoring have existed in Australia for decades. This article critically examines overseas evaluative findings of EM in relation to recidivism, cost-effectiveness and net-widening, as well as some of the issues and concerns that are associated with EM. The article then summarises and explains the limited Australian EM experience to date. It predicts that increased application of EM in Australia seems likely and should be evidence-based. In this context, there is an urgent need for increased understanding about the use and impact of EM in Australia. The article concludes with some observations about the importance of comparative analysis in this context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80-102
Number of pages23
JournalEuropean Journal of Probation
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

electronics
monitoring
experience
sanction
overseas
speaking
radio
trend
costs
evidence

Cite this

BARTELS, Lorana ; Martinovic, Marietta . / Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia. In: European Journal of Probation. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 80-102.
@article{9c62cf68758b423e8238983f594c3a87,
title = "Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia",
abstract = "Electronic monitoring (EM) has been introduced in over 30 countries around the world. In most English-speaking countries, it has moved well beyond experimental status and become a regularly applied penal measure. Australia has been lagging behind this world trend, as EM has yet not become dominant in our correctional landscape. This is even though sanctions that utilise radio-frequency and/or global positioning systems (GPS) monitoring have existed in Australia for decades. This article critically examines overseas evaluative findings of EM in relation to recidivism, cost-effectiveness and net-widening, as well as some of the issues and concerns that are associated with EM. The article then summarises and explains the limited Australian EM experience to date. It predicts that increased application of EM in Australia seems likely and should be evidence-based. In this context, there is an urgent need for increased understanding about the use and impact of EM in Australia. The article concludes with some observations about the importance of comparative analysis in this context.",
keywords = "Australia, electronic monitoring, GPS, home detention, radio-frequency",
author = "Lorana BARTELS and Marietta Martinovic",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/2066220317697658",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "80--102",
journal = "European Journal of Probation",
issn = "2066-2203",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia. / BARTELS, Lorana; Martinovic, Marietta .

In: European Journal of Probation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2017, p. 80-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic monitoring: The experience in Australia

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - Martinovic, Marietta

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Electronic monitoring (EM) has been introduced in over 30 countries around the world. In most English-speaking countries, it has moved well beyond experimental status and become a regularly applied penal measure. Australia has been lagging behind this world trend, as EM has yet not become dominant in our correctional landscape. This is even though sanctions that utilise radio-frequency and/or global positioning systems (GPS) monitoring have existed in Australia for decades. This article critically examines overseas evaluative findings of EM in relation to recidivism, cost-effectiveness and net-widening, as well as some of the issues and concerns that are associated with EM. The article then summarises and explains the limited Australian EM experience to date. It predicts that increased application of EM in Australia seems likely and should be evidence-based. In this context, there is an urgent need for increased understanding about the use and impact of EM in Australia. The article concludes with some observations about the importance of comparative analysis in this context.

AB - Electronic monitoring (EM) has been introduced in over 30 countries around the world. In most English-speaking countries, it has moved well beyond experimental status and become a regularly applied penal measure. Australia has been lagging behind this world trend, as EM has yet not become dominant in our correctional landscape. This is even though sanctions that utilise radio-frequency and/or global positioning systems (GPS) monitoring have existed in Australia for decades. This article critically examines overseas evaluative findings of EM in relation to recidivism, cost-effectiveness and net-widening, as well as some of the issues and concerns that are associated with EM. The article then summarises and explains the limited Australian EM experience to date. It predicts that increased application of EM in Australia seems likely and should be evidence-based. In this context, there is an urgent need for increased understanding about the use and impact of EM in Australia. The article concludes with some observations about the importance of comparative analysis in this context.

KW - Australia

KW - electronic monitoring

KW - GPS

KW - home detention

KW - radio-frequency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045332366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/electronic-monitoring-experience-australia

U2 - 10.1177/2066220317697658

DO - 10.1177/2066220317697658

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 80

EP - 102

JO - European Journal of Probation

JF - European Journal of Probation

SN - 2066-2203

IS - 1

ER -