End-user surveys: A practical approach to evaluating fisheries research performance

James Wells-Green, Debra Rickwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Expenditure on fisheries research is big business in Australia, with over $A20 million spent annually by the Federal Government through its Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. There is little published international literature evaluating the performance offisheries research. Australian-based evaluations are similarly rare, while the topic of research management relating to fisheries, or environmental research more broadly, is largely absent from the literature. This is surprising given the importance of research in informing natural resource decision-making, particularly within fisheries management agencies. The results of our study show that Australian fisheries research undertaken between 1990 and /998 has performed well, averaging a score of 70 per cent when evaluated by end-users. However, areas where improvements may be required were identified, as were the most critical points in the life-cycle of a project. The results also show that end-user surveys are a practical technique for portfolio or program-level evaluations as an augmentation to, but not replacing, traditional benefit-cost analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-155
Number of pages10
JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

fishery
performance
environmental research
cost-benefit analysis
fishery management
evaluation
management
life cycle
Federal Government
research and development
expenditure
natural resources
corporation
expenditures
natural resource
decision making
literature

Cite this

@article{2e14fe27a64f4ebab1783b3119e97877,
title = "End-user surveys: A practical approach to evaluating fisheries research performance",
abstract = "Expenditure on fisheries research is big business in Australia, with over $A20 million spent annually by the Federal Government through its Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. There is little published international literature evaluating the performance offisheries research. Australian-based evaluations are similarly rare, while the topic of research management relating to fisheries, or environmental research more broadly, is largely absent from the literature. This is surprising given the importance of research in informing natural resource decision-making, particularly within fisheries management agencies. The results of our study show that Australian fisheries research undertaken between 1990 and /998 has performed well, averaging a score of 70 per cent when evaluated by end-users. However, areas where improvements may be required were identified, as were the most critical points in the life-cycle of a project. The results also show that end-user surveys are a practical technique for portfolio or program-level evaluations as an augmentation to, but not replacing, traditional benefit-cost analysis.",
author = "James Wells-Green and Debra Rickwood",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/14486563.2006.10648682",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "146--155",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "2159-5356",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

End-user surveys: A practical approach to evaluating fisheries research performance. / Wells-Green, James; Rickwood, Debra.

In: Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2006, p. 146-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - End-user surveys: A practical approach to evaluating fisheries research performance

AU - Wells-Green, James

AU - Rickwood, Debra

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Expenditure on fisheries research is big business in Australia, with over $A20 million spent annually by the Federal Government through its Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. There is little published international literature evaluating the performance offisheries research. Australian-based evaluations are similarly rare, while the topic of research management relating to fisheries, or environmental research more broadly, is largely absent from the literature. This is surprising given the importance of research in informing natural resource decision-making, particularly within fisheries management agencies. The results of our study show that Australian fisheries research undertaken between 1990 and /998 has performed well, averaging a score of 70 per cent when evaluated by end-users. However, areas where improvements may be required were identified, as were the most critical points in the life-cycle of a project. The results also show that end-user surveys are a practical technique for portfolio or program-level evaluations as an augmentation to, but not replacing, traditional benefit-cost analysis.

AB - Expenditure on fisheries research is big business in Australia, with over $A20 million spent annually by the Federal Government through its Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. There is little published international literature evaluating the performance offisheries research. Australian-based evaluations are similarly rare, while the topic of research management relating to fisheries, or environmental research more broadly, is largely absent from the literature. This is surprising given the importance of research in informing natural resource decision-making, particularly within fisheries management agencies. The results of our study show that Australian fisheries research undertaken between 1990 and /998 has performed well, averaging a score of 70 per cent when evaluated by end-users. However, areas where improvements may be required were identified, as were the most critical points in the life-cycle of a project. The results also show that end-user surveys are a practical technique for portfolio or program-level evaluations as an augmentation to, but not replacing, traditional benefit-cost analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894152354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2006.10648682

DO - 10.1080/14486563.2006.10648682

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 146

EP - 155

JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 2159-5356

IS - 3

ER -