Engaging with Private Sector Standards: A case study of GLOBAL G.A.P

Linda Botterill, Carsten Daugbjerg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is now a fairly substantial literature on private global business regulation which focuses on the rise of non-governmental and private regulatory systems alongside traditional state-based systems. These private systems cross national borders and impact on international trade which, in the intergovernmental realm, is governed by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In this article, the authors argue that while in principle private global regulatory trade regimes do not fall under WTO jurisdiction, in practice they are difficult to keep separate. They therefore have the potential to become a concern within the WTO, not only in legal terms, but also from a political perspective because private global regulatory schemes may (re)introduce the distortions into international trade that WTO rules sought to remove. In some cases, a hybridisation of standards occurs as private standards are recognised by public regulatory structures. National governments may find themselves squeezed between their international obligations and the pressures of their citizens, either to respond to consumer concerns themselves and risk being in conflict with their international obligations or to respond to producers seeking action against ‘private red tape’ which is nominally beyond the scope of the WTO. The article takes as its case study an international business-to-business agri-food standards body, GLOBALG.A.P., and explores the issues that arise for global trade governance from the growth in private regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-501
Number of pages17
JournalAustralian Journal of International Affairs
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

World Trade Organization
WTO
private sector
international trade
world trade
obligation
global trade
regulation
national border
jurisdiction
producer
governance
food
citizen

Cite this

@article{3ffdec67face446d970e9b449bb923f4,
title = "Engaging with Private Sector Standards: A case study of GLOBAL G.A.P",
abstract = "There is now a fairly substantial literature on private global business regulation which focuses on the rise of non-governmental and private regulatory systems alongside traditional state-based systems. These private systems cross national borders and impact on international trade which, in the intergovernmental realm, is governed by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In this article, the authors argue that while in principle private global regulatory trade regimes do not fall under WTO jurisdiction, in practice they are difficult to keep separate. They therefore have the potential to become a concern within the WTO, not only in legal terms, but also from a political perspective because private global regulatory schemes may (re)introduce the distortions into international trade that WTO rules sought to remove. In some cases, a hybridisation of standards occurs as private standards are recognised by public regulatory structures. National governments may find themselves squeezed between their international obligations and the pressures of their citizens, either to respond to consumer concerns themselves and risk being in conflict with their international obligations or to respond to producers seeking action against ‘private red tape’ which is nominally beyond the scope of the WTO. The article takes as its case study an international business-to-business agri-food standards body, GLOBALG.A.P., and explores the issues that arise for global trade governance from the growth in private regulation.",
keywords = "Food Regulation, Private Standards, World Trade Organisation",
author = "Linda Botterill and Carsten Daugbjerg",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/10357718.2011.584858",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "485--501",
journal = "Australian Outlook",
issn = "1035-7718",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Engaging with Private Sector Standards: A case study of GLOBAL G.A.P. / Botterill, Linda; Daugbjerg, Carsten.

In: Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 4, 2011, p. 485-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging with Private Sector Standards: A case study of GLOBAL G.A.P

AU - Botterill, Linda

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - There is now a fairly substantial literature on private global business regulation which focuses on the rise of non-governmental and private regulatory systems alongside traditional state-based systems. These private systems cross national borders and impact on international trade which, in the intergovernmental realm, is governed by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In this article, the authors argue that while in principle private global regulatory trade regimes do not fall under WTO jurisdiction, in practice they are difficult to keep separate. They therefore have the potential to become a concern within the WTO, not only in legal terms, but also from a political perspective because private global regulatory schemes may (re)introduce the distortions into international trade that WTO rules sought to remove. In some cases, a hybridisation of standards occurs as private standards are recognised by public regulatory structures. National governments may find themselves squeezed between their international obligations and the pressures of their citizens, either to respond to consumer concerns themselves and risk being in conflict with their international obligations or to respond to producers seeking action against ‘private red tape’ which is nominally beyond the scope of the WTO. The article takes as its case study an international business-to-business agri-food standards body, GLOBALG.A.P., and explores the issues that arise for global trade governance from the growth in private regulation.

AB - There is now a fairly substantial literature on private global business regulation which focuses on the rise of non-governmental and private regulatory systems alongside traditional state-based systems. These private systems cross national borders and impact on international trade which, in the intergovernmental realm, is governed by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In this article, the authors argue that while in principle private global regulatory trade regimes do not fall under WTO jurisdiction, in practice they are difficult to keep separate. They therefore have the potential to become a concern within the WTO, not only in legal terms, but also from a political perspective because private global regulatory schemes may (re)introduce the distortions into international trade that WTO rules sought to remove. In some cases, a hybridisation of standards occurs as private standards are recognised by public regulatory structures. National governments may find themselves squeezed between their international obligations and the pressures of their citizens, either to respond to consumer concerns themselves and risk being in conflict with their international obligations or to respond to producers seeking action against ‘private red tape’ which is nominally beyond the scope of the WTO. The article takes as its case study an international business-to-business agri-food standards body, GLOBALG.A.P., and explores the issues that arise for global trade governance from the growth in private regulation.

KW - Food Regulation

KW - Private Standards

KW - World Trade Organisation

U2 - 10.1080/10357718.2011.584858

DO - 10.1080/10357718.2011.584858

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 485

EP - 501

JO - Australian Outlook

JF - Australian Outlook

SN - 1035-7718

IS - 4

ER -