TY - JOUR
T1 - Environmental flows and water governance
T2 - Managing sustainable water uses
AU - Pahl-Wostl, Claudia
AU - Arthington, Angela
AU - Bogardi, Janos
AU - Bunn, Stuart E.
AU - Hoff, Holger
AU - Lebel, Louis
AU - Nikitina, Elana
AU - Palmer, Margaret
AU - Poff, L.N.
AU - Richards, Keith S.
AU - Schlüter, Maja
AU - Schulze, Roland
AU - St-Hilaire, Andre
AU - Tharme, Rebecca
AU - Tockner, Klement
AU - Tsegai, Daniel
N1 - cited By 52
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.
AB - Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84884530475&doi=10.1016%2fj.cosust.2013.06.009&partnerID=40&md5=d78c574385dc99f1180c22d2c06bb898
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009
M3 - Article
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 5
SP - 341
EP - 351
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
IS - 3-4
ER -