Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses

Claudia Pahl-Wostl, Angela Arthington, Janos Bogardi, Stuart E. Bunn, Holger Hoff, Louis Lebel, Elana Nikitina, Margaret Palmer, L.N. Poff, Kelly Richards, Maja Schlüter, Roland Schulze, Andre St-Hilaire, Rebecca Tharme, Klement Tockner, Daniel Tsegai

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    97 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)341-351
    Number of pages11
    JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
    Volume5
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    water use
    governance
    water
    ecological system
    transdisciplinary
    natural sciences
    interaction
    research approach
    social system
    water management
    resilience
    experience
    social science
    ecosystem function
    ecosystem service
    lack
    science
    evaluation
    management
    ecosystem

    Cite this

    Pahl-Wostl, C., Arthington, A., Bogardi, J., Bunn, S. E., Hoff, H., Lebel, L., ... Tsegai, D. (2013). Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(3-4), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009
    Pahl-Wostl, Claudia ; Arthington, Angela ; Bogardi, Janos ; Bunn, Stuart E. ; Hoff, Holger ; Lebel, Louis ; Nikitina, Elana ; Palmer, Margaret ; Poff, L.N. ; Richards, Kelly ; Schlüter, Maja ; Schulze, Roland ; St-Hilaire, Andre ; Tharme, Rebecca ; Tockner, Klement ; Tsegai, Daniel. / Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses. In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 3-4. pp. 341-351.
    @article{7ac2bb896c1a411da1677f42ef290486,
    title = "Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses",
    abstract = "Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.",
    author = "Claudia Pahl-Wostl and Angela Arthington and Janos Bogardi and Bunn, {Stuart E.} and Holger Hoff and Louis Lebel and Elana Nikitina and Margaret Palmer and L.N. Poff and Kelly Richards and Maja Schl{\"u}ter and Roland Schulze and Andre St-Hilaire and Rebecca Tharme and Klement Tockner and Daniel Tsegai",
    note = "cited By 52",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "341--351",
    journal = "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability",
    issn = "1877-3435",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    Pahl-Wostl, C, Arthington, A, Bogardi, J, Bunn, SE, Hoff, H, Lebel, L, Nikitina, E, Palmer, M, Poff, LN, Richards, K, Schlüter, M, Schulze, R, St-Hilaire, A, Tharme, R, Tockner, K & Tsegai, D 2013, 'Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses', Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009

    Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses. / Pahl-Wostl, Claudia; Arthington, Angela; Bogardi, Janos; Bunn, Stuart E.; Hoff, Holger; Lebel, Louis; Nikitina, Elana; Palmer, Margaret; Poff, L.N.; Richards, Kelly; Schlüter, Maja; Schulze, Roland; St-Hilaire, Andre; Tharme, Rebecca; Tockner, Klement; Tsegai, Daniel.

    In: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Vol. 5, No. 3-4, 2013, p. 341-351.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses

    AU - Pahl-Wostl, Claudia

    AU - Arthington, Angela

    AU - Bogardi, Janos

    AU - Bunn, Stuart E.

    AU - Hoff, Holger

    AU - Lebel, Louis

    AU - Nikitina, Elana

    AU - Palmer, Margaret

    AU - Poff, L.N.

    AU - Richards, Kelly

    AU - Schlüter, Maja

    AU - Schulze, Roland

    AU - St-Hilaire, Andre

    AU - Tharme, Rebecca

    AU - Tockner, Klement

    AU - Tsegai, Daniel

    N1 - cited By 52

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.

    AB - Human water security is often achieved with little consideration of environmental consequences and, even when these are acknowledged, the trade-offs between human and environmental water needs are increasing in frequency and amplitude on the increase. The environmental flows concept has continued to evolve in response to these challenges. However, the field is characterized by a limited transferability of insights, due to the prevalence of specific case-study analyses and a lack of research on the governance of environmental flows. Building on recent advances in environmental flow science, water governance and management, we identify a clear need for a more systematic approach to the determination of environmental flow requirements (EFRs) on both the natural and social science fronts and, in particular, on the interaction between social/political and environmental systems. We suggest a framework that details as to how these advances and interactions can be achieved. The framework supports scientific analysis and practical implementation of EFRs involving systematic compilation, sharing and evaluation of experiences from different riverine ecosystems and governance systems around the globe. The concept of ecosystem services is introduced into the framework to raise awareness for the importance of ecosystem functions for the resilience of social-ecological systems, to support negotiation of trade-offs and development of strategies for adaptive implementation. Experience in implementation of environmental flow policies reveals the need for an engaged, transdisciplinary research approach where research is closely linked to implementation initiatives on the ground. We advocate that this is more effective at building the foundations for sustainable water management.

    UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84884530475&doi=10.1016%2fj.cosust.2013.06.009&partnerID=40&md5=d78c574385dc99f1180c22d2c06bb898

    U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009

    DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.009

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 341

    EP - 351

    JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

    JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

    SN - 1877-3435

    IS - 3-4

    ER -