Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses

A critical appraisal

S. Niemeyer, C. L. Spash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost - benefit analysis and deliberative - participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-585
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

economic method
cost-benefit analysis
pragmatism
valuation
deliberation
environmental policy
political science
manipulation
neglect
pragmatics
citizen
lack
participatory approach
contingent valuation
economics
appraisal
analysis
public
policy

Cite this

@article{3f0819d9aa194448b8bb79a3e9282a9f,
title = "Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses: A critical appraisal",
abstract = "This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost - benefit analysis and deliberative - participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.",
author = "S. Niemeyer and Spash, {C. L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/c9s",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "567--585",
journal = "Environment and Planning C",
issn = "0263-774X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses : A critical appraisal. / Niemeyer, S.; Spash, C. L.

In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.01.2001, p. 567-585.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Environmental valuation analysis, public deliberation, and their pragmatic syntheses

T2 - A critical appraisal

AU - Niemeyer, S.

AU - Spash, C. L.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost - benefit analysis and deliberative - participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

AB - This paper explores how theoretical, practical and political issues are addressed differently by cost - benefit analysis and deliberative - participatory approaches to environmental policy. Theoretically rigorous approaches may prove to be too narrowly defined and so unsuitable because they neglect the requirements of practical implementation. Yet pragmatism which flaunts theoretical understanding lacks analytical power and can mislead policy. How economic methods, such as contingent valuation, compare with those from political science, such as citizens' juries, is an open question which we attempt to address. In addition, the new hybrid approach of deliberative monetary valuation is critically reviewed. A comparison of these approaches is made which draws out the difficulties of developing practical policy tools which are theoretically grounded and avoid political manipulation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034823899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/c9s

DO - 10.1068/c9s

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 567

EP - 585

JO - Environment and Planning C

JF - Environment and Planning C

SN - 0263-774X

IS - 4

ER -