Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics

Robyn Jorgensen, Thelma Perso

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

A national curriculum in Australia (The Australian Curriculum) may represent an
attempt to bring a common experience to all Australian students. It is premised on a notion that shared experiences are part of the national psyche. However, in this presentation, we challenge this approach and argue that the experiences of students living in remote parts of Australia, or those whose home language is not Standard Australian English; or those whose culture is not that of mainstream urban Australia, may be particularly disadvantaged. Other priorities may be necessary for students who consistently are unable to make benchmarks in numeracy (and literacy) which are foundational to active and successful participation in Western practices. Drawing on experiences from remote work, we seek to illustrate how a national intended curriculum will not necessarily improve education provision for students living in remote areas, but most particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students for whom the language of instruction is different from the home languages. A multifaceted approach to understanding equity, and by implication, exclusion, is needed, if the goals of a quality education for all Australians are to be met
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEngaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field
EditorsBill Atweh, Merrilyn Goos, Robyn Jorgensen Dianne Siemon
Place of PublicationAustralia
PublisherMathematics Education Research Group of Australasia
Chapter6
Pages116-133
Number of pages18
ISBN (Print)9781920846268
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

equity
mathematics
curriculum
student
experience
language of instruction
psyche
language
education
exclusion
literacy
participation

Cite this

Jorgensen, R., & Perso, T. (2012). Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, & R. J. D. Siemon (Eds.), Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field (pp. 116-133). Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Jorgensen, Robyn ; Perso, Thelma. / Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field. editor / Bill Atweh ; Merrilyn Goos ; Robyn Jorgensen Dianne Siemon. Australia : Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2012. pp. 116-133
@inbook{f0fef5c168444e44a59945d67b982bb5,
title = "Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics",
abstract = "A national curriculum in Australia (The Australian Curriculum) may represent anattempt to bring a common experience to all Australian students. It is premised on a notion that shared experiences are part of the national psyche. However, in this presentation, we challenge this approach and argue that the experiences of students living in remote parts of Australia, or those whose home language is not Standard Australian English; or those whose culture is not that of mainstream urban Australia, may be particularly disadvantaged. Other priorities may be necessary for students who consistently are unable to make benchmarks in numeracy (and literacy) which are foundational to active and successful participation in Western practices. Drawing on experiences from remote work, we seek to illustrate how a national intended curriculum will not necessarily improve education provision for students living in remote areas, but most particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students for whom the language of instruction is different from the home languages. A multifaceted approach to understanding equity, and by implication, exclusion, is needed, if the goals of a quality education for all Australians are to be met",
keywords = "Australian curriculum, Mathematics, Equity",
author = "Robyn Jorgensen and Thelma Perso",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781920846268",
pages = "116--133",
editor = "Bill Atweh and Merrilyn Goos and Siemon, {Robyn Jorgensen Dianne}",
booktitle = "Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field",
publisher = "Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia",

}

Jorgensen, R & Perso, T 2012, Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. in B Atweh, M Goos & RJD Siemon (eds), Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Australia, pp. 116-133.

Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. / Jorgensen, Robyn; Perso, Thelma.

Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field. ed. / Bill Atweh; Merrilyn Goos; Robyn Jorgensen Dianne Siemon. Australia : Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2012. p. 116-133.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics

AU - Jorgensen, Robyn

AU - Perso, Thelma

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A national curriculum in Australia (The Australian Curriculum) may represent anattempt to bring a common experience to all Australian students. It is premised on a notion that shared experiences are part of the national psyche. However, in this presentation, we challenge this approach and argue that the experiences of students living in remote parts of Australia, or those whose home language is not Standard Australian English; or those whose culture is not that of mainstream urban Australia, may be particularly disadvantaged. Other priorities may be necessary for students who consistently are unable to make benchmarks in numeracy (and literacy) which are foundational to active and successful participation in Western practices. Drawing on experiences from remote work, we seek to illustrate how a national intended curriculum will not necessarily improve education provision for students living in remote areas, but most particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students for whom the language of instruction is different from the home languages. A multifaceted approach to understanding equity, and by implication, exclusion, is needed, if the goals of a quality education for all Australians are to be met

AB - A national curriculum in Australia (The Australian Curriculum) may represent anattempt to bring a common experience to all Australian students. It is premised on a notion that shared experiences are part of the national psyche. However, in this presentation, we challenge this approach and argue that the experiences of students living in remote parts of Australia, or those whose home language is not Standard Australian English; or those whose culture is not that of mainstream urban Australia, may be particularly disadvantaged. Other priorities may be necessary for students who consistently are unable to make benchmarks in numeracy (and literacy) which are foundational to active and successful participation in Western practices. Drawing on experiences from remote work, we seek to illustrate how a national intended curriculum will not necessarily improve education provision for students living in remote areas, but most particularly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students for whom the language of instruction is different from the home languages. A multifaceted approach to understanding equity, and by implication, exclusion, is needed, if the goals of a quality education for all Australians are to be met

KW - Australian curriculum

KW - Mathematics

KW - Equity

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781920846268

SP - 116

EP - 133

BT - Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field

A2 - Atweh, Bill

A2 - Goos, Merrilyn

A2 - Siemon, Robyn Jorgensen Dianne

PB - Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia

CY - Australia

ER -

Jorgensen R, Perso T. Equity and the Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. In Atweh B, Goos M, Siemon RJD, editors, Engaging the Australian National Curriculum: Mathematics - perspectives from the field. Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 2012. p. 116-133