Abstract
The publisher regrets that errors occurred in the typesetting of two equations in Kinnell (2018). Eq. (1) should appear as [Formula presented] In Eq. (1) A _{e,1} is the soil loss for an event on the unit plot, Q _{Re.1} is the runoff coefficient for unit plot for the event, EI _{30} is the product of event rainfall kinetic energy and the maximum 30minute intensity, b1 is an empirical factor and K _{UMM} is the soil erodibility when (Q _{Re.1} EI _{30} ) ^{b1} is used as the erosivity index. K _{UMM} has units that vary when b1 varies geographically, a situation that is undesirable when predicting soil losses using the USLE modelling approach. Eq. (6) should appear as [Formula presented] a1 is the factor that appears in Eq. (2), [Formula presented] that enables K _{UMM} to be replaced by K _{UM} , the soil erodibility factor associated with the Q _{Re.1} EI _{30} erosivity index. Eq. (6) results from [Formula presented] a1 is mathematically related to b1 and contrary to K _{UMM} , K _{UM} has units that do not vary with b1. Consequently, Eq. (2) uses soil erodibility values that are consistent with the USLE modelling approach. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Original language  English 

Pages (fromto)  220 
Number of pages  1 
Journal  Catena 
Volume  179 
DOIs 

Publication status  Published  1 Aug 2019 
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Erratum to “Reply to comment on “Determining soil erodibility for the USLEMM rainfall erosion model by P.I.A. Kinnell”” [Catena 167 (2018) 444–447]. / Kinnell, P. I.A.
In: Catena, Vol. 179, 01.08.2019, p. 220.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate
TY  JOUR
T1  Erratum to “Reply to comment on “Determining soil erodibility for the USLEMM rainfall erosion model by P.I.A. Kinnell”” [Catena 167 (2018) 444–447]
AU  Kinnell, P. I.A.
PY  2019/8/1
Y1  2019/8/1
N2  The publisher regrets that errors occurred in the typesetting of two equations in Kinnell (2018). Eq. (1) should appear as [Formula presented] In Eq. (1) A e,1 is the soil loss for an event on the unit plot, Q Re.1 is the runoff coefficient for unit plot for the event, EI 30 is the product of event rainfall kinetic energy and the maximum 30minute intensity, b1 is an empirical factor and K UMM is the soil erodibility when (Q Re.1 EI 30 ) b1 is used as the erosivity index. K UMM has units that vary when b1 varies geographically, a situation that is undesirable when predicting soil losses using the USLE modelling approach. Eq. (6) should appear as [Formula presented] a1 is the factor that appears in Eq. (2), [Formula presented] that enables K UMM to be replaced by K UM , the soil erodibility factor associated with the Q Re.1 EI 30 erosivity index. Eq. (6) results from [Formula presented] a1 is mathematically related to b1 and contrary to K UMM , K UM has units that do not vary with b1. Consequently, Eq. (2) uses soil erodibility values that are consistent with the USLE modelling approach. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB  The publisher regrets that errors occurred in the typesetting of two equations in Kinnell (2018). Eq. (1) should appear as [Formula presented] In Eq. (1) A e,1 is the soil loss for an event on the unit plot, Q Re.1 is the runoff coefficient for unit plot for the event, EI 30 is the product of event rainfall kinetic energy and the maximum 30minute intensity, b1 is an empirical factor and K UMM is the soil erodibility when (Q Re.1 EI 30 ) b1 is used as the erosivity index. K UMM has units that vary when b1 varies geographically, a situation that is undesirable when predicting soil losses using the USLE modelling approach. Eq. (6) should appear as [Formula presented] a1 is the factor that appears in Eq. (2), [Formula presented] that enables K UMM to be replaced by K UM , the soil erodibility factor associated with the Q Re.1 EI 30 erosivity index. Eq. (6) results from [Formula presented] a1 is mathematically related to b1 and contrary to K UMM , K UM has units that do not vary with b1. Consequently, Eq. (2) uses soil erodibility values that are consistent with the USLE modelling approach. The publisher would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR  http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063580783&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR  http://www.mendeley.com/research/erratumreplycommentdeterminingsoilerodibilityuslemmrainfallerosionmodelpiakinnellcatena1
U2  10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.045
DO  10.1016/j.catena.2019.03.045
M3  Comment/debate
VL  179
SP  220
JO  Catena
JF  Catena
SN  03418162
ER 