Establishing an expert mental health consumer research group: Perspectives of nonconsumer researchers

Brenda Happell, Sarah Gordon, Cath Roper, Pete Ellis, Shifra Waks, Terri Warner, Brett Scholz, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the views and opinions of nonconsumer researchers to the concept of an Expert Consumer Researcher Group. Design and Methods: Qualitative exploratory involving individual interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers experienced in working collaboratively with consumer researchers. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings: Participants viewed the concept positively, albeit with caution. Perceived advantages included: greater visibility and enhanced access; collegiality; sharing and creating expertise; broader acceptance; making it mandatory; and structure and location. Participants were concerned about potential tokenism and implementation barriers. Practice Implications: Consumer involvement enhances the quality and relevance of research, potentially impacting clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-42
Number of pages10
JournalPerspectives in Psychiatric Care
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2020
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing an expert mental health consumer research group: Perspectives of nonconsumer researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this