Abstract
Purpose: To explore the views and opinions of nonconsumer researchers to the concept of an Expert Consumer Researcher Group. Design and Methods: Qualitative exploratory involving individual interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers experienced in working collaboratively with consumer researchers. Data were analyzed thematically. Findings: Participants viewed the concept positively, albeit with caution. Perceived advantages included: greater visibility and enhanced access; collegiality; sharing and creating expertise; broader acceptance; making it mandatory; and structure and location. Participants were concerned about potential tokenism and implementation barriers. Practice Implications: Consumer involvement enhances the quality and relevance of research, potentially impacting clinical practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 33-42 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Perspectives in Psychiatric Care |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Apr 2020 |
Externally published | Yes |