Establishing Indigeneity in African Pluralities using PRO169 Parameters and a Case Study for Measuring their Inclusivity

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The concept of the indigenous person or group in Africa is a contentious one. The current argument is that there exist no indigenous people in Africa because all Africans are indigenous. The obverse considers those Africans who have not been touched by colonialism and lost their pre-nation state social structures commensurate with attachments to the lands or a distinguishable lifestyle to be indigenous. This paper argues in favour of the latter. People who live in the global telos and do not participate in a distinct social structure that has been attached to the land before the advent of nation-states are not indigenous. It is argued that this cultural divergence between global consumerism and indigenous pre-nation state social structures is the major identifying point to settle the indigenous/non indigenous African debate. Finally, the paper looks at inclusive development and provides a new political analysis model for quantifying inclusivity so as to measure the inclusivity of indigenous peoples.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)323-346
    Number of pages24
    JournalAfrican and Asian Studies
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    nation state
    social structure
    colonialism
    model analysis
    colonial age
    lifestyle
    divergence
    human being
    parameter
    measuring
    Africa
    Inclusivity
    Plurality
    Indigeneity
    Group
    land
    Social Structure
    Nation-state

    Cite this

    @article{a41e22570ad0410ab0612f8a2c32e637,
    title = "Establishing Indigeneity in African Pluralities using PRO169 Parameters and a Case Study for Measuring their Inclusivity",
    abstract = "The concept of the indigenous person or group in Africa is a contentious one. The current argument is that there exist no indigenous people in Africa because all Africans are indigenous. The obverse considers those Africans who have not been touched by colonialism and lost their pre-nation state social structures commensurate with attachments to the lands or a distinguishable lifestyle to be indigenous. This paper argues in favour of the latter. People who live in the global telos and do not participate in a distinct social structure that has been attached to the land before the advent of nation-states are not indigenous. It is argued that this cultural divergence between global consumerism and indigenous pre-nation state social structures is the major identifying point to settle the indigenous/non indigenous African debate. Finally, the paper looks at inclusive development and provides a new political analysis model for quantifying inclusivity so as to measure the inclusivity of indigenous peoples.",
    keywords = "indigenous, Africa, culture, globalization, PRO169",
    author = "Jean-Paul GAGNON",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1163/156921011X605580",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "323--346",
    journal = "African and Asian Studies",
    issn = "1569-2094",
    publisher = "Brill",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Establishing Indigeneity in African Pluralities using PRO169 Parameters and a Case Study for Measuring their Inclusivity

    AU - GAGNON, Jean-Paul

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - The concept of the indigenous person or group in Africa is a contentious one. The current argument is that there exist no indigenous people in Africa because all Africans are indigenous. The obverse considers those Africans who have not been touched by colonialism and lost their pre-nation state social structures commensurate with attachments to the lands or a distinguishable lifestyle to be indigenous. This paper argues in favour of the latter. People who live in the global telos and do not participate in a distinct social structure that has been attached to the land before the advent of nation-states are not indigenous. It is argued that this cultural divergence between global consumerism and indigenous pre-nation state social structures is the major identifying point to settle the indigenous/non indigenous African debate. Finally, the paper looks at inclusive development and provides a new political analysis model for quantifying inclusivity so as to measure the inclusivity of indigenous peoples.

    AB - The concept of the indigenous person or group in Africa is a contentious one. The current argument is that there exist no indigenous people in Africa because all Africans are indigenous. The obverse considers those Africans who have not been touched by colonialism and lost their pre-nation state social structures commensurate with attachments to the lands or a distinguishable lifestyle to be indigenous. This paper argues in favour of the latter. People who live in the global telos and do not participate in a distinct social structure that has been attached to the land before the advent of nation-states are not indigenous. It is argued that this cultural divergence between global consumerism and indigenous pre-nation state social structures is the major identifying point to settle the indigenous/non indigenous African debate. Finally, the paper looks at inclusive development and provides a new political analysis model for quantifying inclusivity so as to measure the inclusivity of indigenous peoples.

    KW - indigenous

    KW - Africa

    KW - culture

    KW - globalization

    KW - PRO169

    U2 - 10.1163/156921011X605580

    DO - 10.1163/156921011X605580

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 323

    EP - 346

    JO - African and Asian Studies

    JF - African and Asian Studies

    SN - 1569-2094

    IS - 4

    ER -