Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: Paralleling the WTO?

Carsten Daugbjerg, Linda Botterill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-317
Number of pages11
JournalPolicy and Society
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

WTO
food
Values
food consumption
political activity
world trade
commodity
regime
regulation
interpretation

Cite this

@article{6722481f89124932a299ed0eea7ac0c1,
title = "Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: Paralleling the WTO?",
abstract = "Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food",
author = "Carsten Daugbjerg and Linda Botterill",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "307--317",
journal = "Policy and Society",
issn = "1449-4035",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: Paralleling the WTO? / Daugbjerg, Carsten; Botterill, Linda.

In: Policy and Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2012, p. 307-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: Paralleling the WTO?

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

AU - Botterill, Linda

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food

AB - Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food

U2 - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 307

EP - 317

JO - Policy and Society

JF - Policy and Society

SN - 1449-4035

IS - 4

ER -