Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper identifies and discusses ethical issues associated with the increasingly common use of multiple reminders in postal survey research. When undertaking postal surveys, it is common to improve response rates by contacting survey recipients multiple times encouraging them to complete the questionnaire. The ethical implications of the use of multiple reminders are rarely discussed in the literature advocating their use. The paper briefly the arguments encouraging use of multiple reminders, and identifies and discusses the potential ethical issues raised by their use in postal surveys. A set of principles is then proposed for using multiple reminders in an ethically responsible way. It is argued that by following these principles, the use of multiple reminders should present no increased potential for harassment or coercion of survey recipients compared to alternative survey techniques. The use of these principles in a recent postal survey is then presented and discussed; a 60% response rate was achieved utilising multiple survey reminders in a way consistent with this set of principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-139
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Academic Ethics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

recipient
survey research
Ethical Issues
questionnaire
Recipient
time
literature
Survey Research
Coercion
Harassment
Questionnaire

Cite this

@article{192043ea0a8540da89dc017ca0e93cf2,
title = "Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders",
abstract = "This paper identifies and discusses ethical issues associated with the increasingly common use of multiple reminders in postal survey research. When undertaking postal surveys, it is common to improve response rates by contacting survey recipients multiple times encouraging them to complete the questionnaire. The ethical implications of the use of multiple reminders are rarely discussed in the literature advocating their use. The paper briefly the arguments encouraging use of multiple reminders, and identifies and discusses the potential ethical issues raised by their use in postal surveys. A set of principles is then proposed for using multiple reminders in an ethically responsible way. It is argued that by following these principles, the use of multiple reminders should present no increased potential for harassment or coercion of survey recipients compared to alternative survey techniques. The use of these principles in a recent postal survey is then presented and discussed; a 60{\%} response rate was achieved utilising multiple survey reminders in a way consistent with this set of principles.",
keywords = "Coercion, Ethics, Harassment, Postal surveys, Reminders, Response rates",
author = "Jacki Schirmer",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s10805-009-9072-5",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "125--139",
journal = "Journal of Academic Ethics",
issn = "1570-1727",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders. / Schirmer, Jacki.

In: Journal of Academic Ethics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 11.2009, p. 125-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical issues in the use of multiple survey reminders

AU - Schirmer, Jacki

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - This paper identifies and discusses ethical issues associated with the increasingly common use of multiple reminders in postal survey research. When undertaking postal surveys, it is common to improve response rates by contacting survey recipients multiple times encouraging them to complete the questionnaire. The ethical implications of the use of multiple reminders are rarely discussed in the literature advocating their use. The paper briefly the arguments encouraging use of multiple reminders, and identifies and discusses the potential ethical issues raised by their use in postal surveys. A set of principles is then proposed for using multiple reminders in an ethically responsible way. It is argued that by following these principles, the use of multiple reminders should present no increased potential for harassment or coercion of survey recipients compared to alternative survey techniques. The use of these principles in a recent postal survey is then presented and discussed; a 60% response rate was achieved utilising multiple survey reminders in a way consistent with this set of principles.

AB - This paper identifies and discusses ethical issues associated with the increasingly common use of multiple reminders in postal survey research. When undertaking postal surveys, it is common to improve response rates by contacting survey recipients multiple times encouraging them to complete the questionnaire. The ethical implications of the use of multiple reminders are rarely discussed in the literature advocating their use. The paper briefly the arguments encouraging use of multiple reminders, and identifies and discusses the potential ethical issues raised by their use in postal surveys. A set of principles is then proposed for using multiple reminders in an ethically responsible way. It is argued that by following these principles, the use of multiple reminders should present no increased potential for harassment or coercion of survey recipients compared to alternative survey techniques. The use of these principles in a recent postal survey is then presented and discussed; a 60% response rate was achieved utilising multiple survey reminders in a way consistent with this set of principles.

KW - Coercion

KW - Ethics

KW - Harassment

KW - Postal surveys

KW - Reminders

KW - Response rates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70949083532&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10805-009-9072-5

DO - 10.1007/s10805-009-9072-5

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 125

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Academic Ethics

JF - Journal of Academic Ethics

SN - 1570-1727

IS - 1

ER -