Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests

How questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health

X Baur, L Budnik, K Ruff, D Egilman, R Lemen, Colin SOSKOLNE

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clinical and public health research, education, and medical practice are vulnerable to influence by corporate interests driven by the for-profit motive. Developments over the last 10 years have shown that transparency and self-reporting of corporate ties do not always mitigate bias. In this article, we provide examples of how sound scientific reasoning and evidence-gathering are undermined through compromised scientific enquiry resulting in misleading science, decision-making, and policy intervention. Various medical disciplines provide reference literature essential for informing public, environmental, and occupational health policy. Published literature impacts clinical and laboratory methods, the validity of respective clinical guidelines, and the development and implementation of public health regulations. Said literature is also used in expert testimony related to resolving tort actions on work-related illnesses and environmental risks. We call for increased sensitivity, full transparency, and the implementation of effective ethical and professional praxis rules at all relevant regulatory levels to rout out inappropriate corporate influence in science. This is needed because influencing the integrity of scientists who engage in such activities cannot be depended upon.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-175
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Ethics
Public Health
Environmental Illness
Legal Liability
Environmental Health
Expert Testimony
Occupational Health
Health Policy
Health Education
Biomedical Research
Decision Making
Guidelines

Cite this

@article{084c42102afc4231935ccaa1a6cca35f,
title = "Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests: How questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health",
abstract = "Clinical and public health research, education, and medical practice are vulnerable to influence by corporate interests driven by the for-profit motive. Developments over the last 10 years have shown that transparency and self-reporting of corporate ties do not always mitigate bias. In this article, we provide examples of how sound scientific reasoning and evidence-gathering are undermined through compromised scientific enquiry resulting in misleading science, decision-making, and policy intervention. Various medical disciplines provide reference literature essential for informing public, environmental, and occupational health policy. Published literature impacts clinical and laboratory methods, the validity of respective clinical guidelines, and the development and implementation of public health regulations. Said literature is also used in expert testimony related to resolving tort actions on work-related illnesses and environmental risks. We call for increased sensitivity, full transparency, and the implementation of effective ethical and professional praxis rules at all relevant regulatory levels to rout out inappropriate corporate influence in science. This is needed because influencing the integrity of scientists who engage in such activities cannot be depended upon.",
keywords = "Conflict of interest, Corporate ties, Environmental health, Ethics in medical science, Moral dimension of bioscience",
author = "X Baur and L Budnik and K Ruff and D Egilman and R Lemen and Colin SOSKOLNE",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000103",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "172--175",
journal = "International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health",
issn = "1077-3525",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests : How questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health. / Baur, X; Budnik, L; Ruff, K; Egilman, D; Lemen, R; SOSKOLNE, Colin.

In: International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2015, p. 172-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics, morality, and conflicting interests

T2 - How questionable professional integrity in some scientists supports global corporate influence in public health

AU - Baur, X

AU - Budnik, L

AU - Ruff, K

AU - Egilman, D

AU - Lemen, R

AU - SOSKOLNE, Colin

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Clinical and public health research, education, and medical practice are vulnerable to influence by corporate interests driven by the for-profit motive. Developments over the last 10 years have shown that transparency and self-reporting of corporate ties do not always mitigate bias. In this article, we provide examples of how sound scientific reasoning and evidence-gathering are undermined through compromised scientific enquiry resulting in misleading science, decision-making, and policy intervention. Various medical disciplines provide reference literature essential for informing public, environmental, and occupational health policy. Published literature impacts clinical and laboratory methods, the validity of respective clinical guidelines, and the development and implementation of public health regulations. Said literature is also used in expert testimony related to resolving tort actions on work-related illnesses and environmental risks. We call for increased sensitivity, full transparency, and the implementation of effective ethical and professional praxis rules at all relevant regulatory levels to rout out inappropriate corporate influence in science. This is needed because influencing the integrity of scientists who engage in such activities cannot be depended upon.

AB - Clinical and public health research, education, and medical practice are vulnerable to influence by corporate interests driven by the for-profit motive. Developments over the last 10 years have shown that transparency and self-reporting of corporate ties do not always mitigate bias. In this article, we provide examples of how sound scientific reasoning and evidence-gathering are undermined through compromised scientific enquiry resulting in misleading science, decision-making, and policy intervention. Various medical disciplines provide reference literature essential for informing public, environmental, and occupational health policy. Published literature impacts clinical and laboratory methods, the validity of respective clinical guidelines, and the development and implementation of public health regulations. Said literature is also used in expert testimony related to resolving tort actions on work-related illnesses and environmental risks. We call for increased sensitivity, full transparency, and the implementation of effective ethical and professional praxis rules at all relevant regulatory levels to rout out inappropriate corporate influence in science. This is needed because influencing the integrity of scientists who engage in such activities cannot be depended upon.

KW - Conflict of interest

KW - Corporate ties

KW - Environmental health

KW - Ethics in medical science

KW - Moral dimension of bioscience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937130320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/ethics-morality-conflicting-interests-questionable-professional-integrity-some-scientists-supports-g

U2 - 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000103

DO - 10.1179/2049396714Y.0000000103

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 21

SP - 172

EP - 175

JO - International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health

JF - International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health

SN - 1077-3525

IS - 2

ER -