Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluating mental health care reform: including the clinician, client, and family perspective

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article suggests one direction that theory building might take to develop a stronger conceptual foundation needed to test the effect on clients of reforms in the financing and organization of mental health care delivery systems. The authors recommend that health status outcomes be measured from three perspectives: the client, who can best report his or her own subjective experience of illness; the clinician, who is the best source of information about the client's disease; and the family, which is the best source of information about the effects on members' health status of caring for a mentally ill family member. The authors also recommend that measurement of health status should be multidimensional.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)313-319
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Mental Health Administration
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1994
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating mental health care reform: including the clinician, client, and family perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this