Evaluating the evaluators: Perceptions of interviewers by rejected job applicants as a function of interviewer and applicant sex

Rebecca Holloway, Lucy Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students who had recently had an unsuccessful job interview rated the competence of their interviewer and completed the Women As Managers Scale (WAMS; Terborg, Peters, Ilgen, & Smith, 1977). The results showed an impact of the sex of interviewer on judgments of interviewer competence and WAMS scores, but only for male participants. Male participants gave lower ratings of interviewer competence to female than to male interviewers, and ratings for the female interviewers were also lower than those given by female participants. Scores on the WAMS were lower for male participants who were interviewed by a female interviewer than those interviewed by a male interviewer, and were lower for male than for female participants with a female interviewer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2635-2648
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume36
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the evaluators: Perceptions of interviewers by rejected job applicants as a function of interviewer and applicant sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this