Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach

Pilar Rodriguez, Zurine Maestre, Maite Martinez-Madrid, Trefor Reynoldson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Sediments from 71 river sites in Northern Spain were tested using the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) chronic bioassay. 47 sediments were identified as reference primarily from macroinvertebrate community characteristics. The data for the toxicological endpoints were examined using non-metric MDS. Probability ellipses were constructed around the reference sites in multidimensional space to establish aclassification for assessing test-sediments into one of three categories (Non Toxic, Potentially Toxic, and Toxic). The construction of such probability ellipses sets the Type I errorrate. However, we also wished to include in the decision process for identifying passâ¿¿fail boundaries the degree of disturbance required to be detected, and the likelihood of being wrong in detecting that disturbance (i.e. the TypeIIerror). Setting the ellipse size to use based on Type I error does not include any consideration of the probability of TypeIIerror. To do this, the toxicological response observed in the referencesediments was manipulated by simulating different degrees of disturbance (simpactedsediments), and measuring the TypeIIerrorrate for each set of the simpactedsediments. From this procedure, the frequency at each probability ellipse of identifying impairment using sediments with known level of disturbance is quantified. Thirteen levels of disturbance and seven probability ellipses were tested. Based on the results the decision boundary for Non Toxic and Potentially Toxic was set at the 80% probability ellipse, and the boundary for Potentially Toxic and Toxic at the 95% probability ellipse. Using this approach, 9 test sediments were classified as Toxic, 2 as Potentially Toxic, and 13 as Non Toxic.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)207-213
    Number of pages7
    JournalAquatic Toxicology
    Volume101
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Poisons
    ellipse
    toxicity
    sediments
    disturbance
    sediment
    Tubifex tubifex
    Toxicology
    Oligochaeta
    Annelida
    rate
    endpoints
    macroinvertebrates
    macroinvertebrate
    bioassay
    bioassays
    testing
    Spain
    Rivers
    Biological Assay

    Cite this

    Rodriguez, Pilar ; Maestre, Zurine ; Martinez-Madrid, Maite ; Reynoldson, Trefor. / Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach. In: Aquatic Toxicology. 2011 ; Vol. 101, No. 1. pp. 207-213.
    @article{889958f3d92a4740bb0d921588f9aa2f,
    title = "Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach",
    abstract = "Sediments from 71 river sites in Northern Spain were tested using the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) chronic bioassay. 47 sediments were identified as reference primarily from macroinvertebrate community characteristics. The data for the toxicological endpoints were examined using non-metric MDS. Probability ellipses were constructed around the reference sites in multidimensional space to establish aclassification for assessing test-sediments into one of three categories (Non Toxic, Potentially Toxic, and Toxic). The construction of such probability ellipses sets the Type I errorrate. However, we also wished to include in the decision process for identifying pass{\^a}¿¿fail boundaries the degree of disturbance required to be detected, and the likelihood of being wrong in detecting that disturbance (i.e. the TypeIIerror). Setting the ellipse size to use based on Type I error does not include any consideration of the probability of TypeIIerror. To do this, the toxicological response observed in the referencesediments was manipulated by simulating different degrees of disturbance (simpactedsediments), and measuring the TypeIIerrorrate for each set of the simpactedsediments. From this procedure, the frequency at each probability ellipse of identifying impairment using sediments with known level of disturbance is quantified. Thirteen levels of disturbance and seven probability ellipses were tested. Based on the results the decision boundary for Non Toxic and Potentially Toxic was set at the 80{\%} probability ellipse, and the boundary for Potentially Toxic and Toxic at the 95{\%} probability ellipse. Using this approach, 9 test sediments were classified as Toxic, 2 as Potentially Toxic, and 13 as Non Toxic.",
    keywords = "Sedimenttoxicity, Tubifex, Referencecondition, Probability ellipses",
    author = "Pilar Rodriguez and Zurine Maestre and Maite Martinez-Madrid and Trefor Reynoldson",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.020",
    language = "English",
    volume = "101",
    pages = "207--213",
    journal = "Acquayic Toxicology",
    issn = "0166-445X",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "1",

    }

    Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach. / Rodriguez, Pilar; Maestre, Zurine; Martinez-Madrid, Maite; Reynoldson, Trefor.

    In: Aquatic Toxicology, Vol. 101, No. 1, 2011, p. 207-213.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Evaluating the Type II error rate in a sediment toxicity classification using the Reference Condition Approach

    AU - Rodriguez, Pilar

    AU - Maestre, Zurine

    AU - Martinez-Madrid, Maite

    AU - Reynoldson, Trefor

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Sediments from 71 river sites in Northern Spain were tested using the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) chronic bioassay. 47 sediments were identified as reference primarily from macroinvertebrate community characteristics. The data for the toxicological endpoints were examined using non-metric MDS. Probability ellipses were constructed around the reference sites in multidimensional space to establish aclassification for assessing test-sediments into one of three categories (Non Toxic, Potentially Toxic, and Toxic). The construction of such probability ellipses sets the Type I errorrate. However, we also wished to include in the decision process for identifying passâ¿¿fail boundaries the degree of disturbance required to be detected, and the likelihood of being wrong in detecting that disturbance (i.e. the TypeIIerror). Setting the ellipse size to use based on Type I error does not include any consideration of the probability of TypeIIerror. To do this, the toxicological response observed in the referencesediments was manipulated by simulating different degrees of disturbance (simpactedsediments), and measuring the TypeIIerrorrate for each set of the simpactedsediments. From this procedure, the frequency at each probability ellipse of identifying impairment using sediments with known level of disturbance is quantified. Thirteen levels of disturbance and seven probability ellipses were tested. Based on the results the decision boundary for Non Toxic and Potentially Toxic was set at the 80% probability ellipse, and the boundary for Potentially Toxic and Toxic at the 95% probability ellipse. Using this approach, 9 test sediments were classified as Toxic, 2 as Potentially Toxic, and 13 as Non Toxic.

    AB - Sediments from 71 river sites in Northern Spain were tested using the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) chronic bioassay. 47 sediments were identified as reference primarily from macroinvertebrate community characteristics. The data for the toxicological endpoints were examined using non-metric MDS. Probability ellipses were constructed around the reference sites in multidimensional space to establish aclassification for assessing test-sediments into one of three categories (Non Toxic, Potentially Toxic, and Toxic). The construction of such probability ellipses sets the Type I errorrate. However, we also wished to include in the decision process for identifying passâ¿¿fail boundaries the degree of disturbance required to be detected, and the likelihood of being wrong in detecting that disturbance (i.e. the TypeIIerror). Setting the ellipse size to use based on Type I error does not include any consideration of the probability of TypeIIerror. To do this, the toxicological response observed in the referencesediments was manipulated by simulating different degrees of disturbance (simpactedsediments), and measuring the TypeIIerrorrate for each set of the simpactedsediments. From this procedure, the frequency at each probability ellipse of identifying impairment using sediments with known level of disturbance is quantified. Thirteen levels of disturbance and seven probability ellipses were tested. Based on the results the decision boundary for Non Toxic and Potentially Toxic was set at the 80% probability ellipse, and the boundary for Potentially Toxic and Toxic at the 95% probability ellipse. Using this approach, 9 test sediments were classified as Toxic, 2 as Potentially Toxic, and 13 as Non Toxic.

    KW - Sedimenttoxicity

    KW - Tubifex

    KW - Referencecondition

    KW - Probability ellipses

    U2 - 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.020

    DO - 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.09.020

    M3 - Article

    VL - 101

    SP - 207

    EP - 213

    JO - Acquayic Toxicology

    JF - Acquayic Toxicology

    SN - 0166-445X

    IS - 1

    ER -