Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study

Katja Goetz, Joachim Szécsényi, Anja Klingenberg, Marc Brodowski, Michael Wensing, Stephen Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patients' evaluation of care presents an essential dimension of the quality of care. The aim of this exploratory study was to determine which factors of EUROPEP-Dental were associated with overall patients' evaluation of oral health care.

Methods: Data were collected from 8,160 patients from 106 dental practices (response rate 77%) who completed the 30-item EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire. The possible answers ranged from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire covers four domains: dentist-patient relationship' (11 items), accessibility and waiting time' (10 items), quality of care' (six items), costs of care' (three items). Each domain was aggregated by mean scores of the associated items. Regression analyses were performed in addition to descriptive analyses.

Results: Over 66% of the patients were overall positive with their dental care. Linear regression analyses were performed with patient satisfaction as the dependent outcome variable. The item medical-technical quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.378) of explained variance, while the EUROPEP-Dental domain quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.467) for explained variance regarding overall patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: The results are important for understanding patients' priorities with regard to oral health care and for identifying possible areas for improvement of quality. The evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care is likely to continue to be an important aspect of oral health-care evaluation
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-323
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Dental Journal
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Oral Health
Germany
Tooth
Delivery of Health Care
Patient Satisfaction
Dentist-Patient Relations
Regression Analysis
Dental Care
Quality Improvement
Linear Models
Patient Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Goetz, K., Szécsényi, J., Klingenberg, A., Brodowski, M., Wensing, M., & Campbell, S. (2013). Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study. International Dental Journal, 63(6), 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12047
Goetz, Katja ; Szécsényi, Joachim ; Klingenberg, Anja ; Brodowski, Marc ; Wensing, Michael ; Campbell, Stephen. / Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study. In: International Dental Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 63, No. 6. pp. 317-323.
@article{cc24c1149ae14fb6b677fd4cf1fd98ed,
title = "Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study",
abstract = "Background: Patients' evaluation of care presents an essential dimension of the quality of care. The aim of this exploratory study was to determine which factors of EUROPEP-Dental were associated with overall patients' evaluation of oral health care. Methods: Data were collected from 8,160 patients from 106 dental practices (response rate 77{\%}) who completed the 30-item EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire. The possible answers ranged from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire covers four domains: dentist-patient relationship' (11 items), accessibility and waiting time' (10 items), quality of care' (six items), costs of care' (three items). Each domain was aggregated by mean scores of the associated items. Regression analyses were performed in addition to descriptive analyses. Results: Over 66{\%} of the patients were overall positive with their dental care. Linear regression analyses were performed with patient satisfaction as the dependent outcome variable. The item medical-technical quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.378) of explained variance, while the EUROPEP-Dental domain quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.467) for explained variance regarding overall patient satisfaction. Conclusions: The results are important for understanding patients' priorities with regard to oral health care and for identifying possible areas for improvement of quality. The evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care is likely to continue to be an important aspect of oral health-care evaluation",
author = "Katja Goetz and Joachim Sz{\'e}cs{\'e}nyi and Anja Klingenberg and Marc Brodowski and Michael Wensing and Stephen Campbell",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/idj.12047",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "317--323",
journal = "International Dental Journal",
issn = "0020-6539",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Goetz, K, Szécsényi, J, Klingenberg, A, Brodowski, M, Wensing, M & Campbell, S 2013, 'Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study', International Dental Journal, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12047

Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study. / Goetz, Katja; Szécsényi, Joachim; Klingenberg, Anja; Brodowski, Marc; Wensing, Michael; Campbell, Stephen.

In: International Dental Journal, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2013, p. 317-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care in Germany - An exploratory study

AU - Goetz, Katja

AU - Szécsényi, Joachim

AU - Klingenberg, Anja

AU - Brodowski, Marc

AU - Wensing, Michael

AU - Campbell, Stephen

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Patients' evaluation of care presents an essential dimension of the quality of care. The aim of this exploratory study was to determine which factors of EUROPEP-Dental were associated with overall patients' evaluation of oral health care. Methods: Data were collected from 8,160 patients from 106 dental practices (response rate 77%) who completed the 30-item EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire. The possible answers ranged from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire covers four domains: dentist-patient relationship' (11 items), accessibility and waiting time' (10 items), quality of care' (six items), costs of care' (three items). Each domain was aggregated by mean scores of the associated items. Regression analyses were performed in addition to descriptive analyses. Results: Over 66% of the patients were overall positive with their dental care. Linear regression analyses were performed with patient satisfaction as the dependent outcome variable. The item medical-technical quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.378) of explained variance, while the EUROPEP-Dental domain quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.467) for explained variance regarding overall patient satisfaction. Conclusions: The results are important for understanding patients' priorities with regard to oral health care and for identifying possible areas for improvement of quality. The evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care is likely to continue to be an important aspect of oral health-care evaluation

AB - Background: Patients' evaluation of care presents an essential dimension of the quality of care. The aim of this exploratory study was to determine which factors of EUROPEP-Dental were associated with overall patients' evaluation of oral health care. Methods: Data were collected from 8,160 patients from 106 dental practices (response rate 77%) who completed the 30-item EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire. The possible answers ranged from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). The EUROPEP-Dental questionnaire covers four domains: dentist-patient relationship' (11 items), accessibility and waiting time' (10 items), quality of care' (six items), costs of care' (three items). Each domain was aggregated by mean scores of the associated items. Regression analyses were performed in addition to descriptive analyses. Results: Over 66% of the patients were overall positive with their dental care. Linear regression analyses were performed with patient satisfaction as the dependent outcome variable. The item medical-technical quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.378) of explained variance, while the EUROPEP-Dental domain quality of care' showed the highest score (R-2=0.467) for explained variance regarding overall patient satisfaction. Conclusions: The results are important for understanding patients' priorities with regard to oral health care and for identifying possible areas for improvement of quality. The evaluation of patient perspective on quality of oral health care is likely to continue to be an important aspect of oral health-care evaluation

U2 - 10.1111/idj.12047

DO - 10.1111/idj.12047

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 317

EP - 323

JO - International Dental Journal

JF - International Dental Journal

SN - 0020-6539

IS - 6

ER -