Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions

Laura Evans, Penney Upton, Dominic UPTON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite clear benefits of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach to ensuring quality and consistency of care, its uptake within physiotherapy has been inconsistent. Objectives: Synthesise the findings of research into EBP barriers, facilitators and interventions in physiotherapy and identify methods of enhancing adoption and implementation. Data sources: Literature concerning physiotherapists' practice between 2000 and 2012 was systematically searched using: Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, American Psychological Association databases, Medline, Journal Storage, and Science Direct. Reference lists were searched to identify additional studies. Study selection: Thirty-two studies, focusing either on physiotherapists' EBP knowledge, attitudes or implementation, or EBP interventions in physiotherapy were included. Data extraction and synthesis: One author undertook all data extraction and a second author reviewed to ensure consistency and rigour. Synthesis was organised around the themes of EBP barriers/enablers, attitudes, knowledge/skills, use and interventions. Results: Many physiotherapists hold positive attitudes towards EBP. However, this does not necessarily translate into consistent, high-quality EBP. Many barriers to EBP implementation are apparent, including: lack of time and skills, and misperceptions of EBP. Limitations: Only studies published in the English language, in peer-reviewed journals were included, thereby introducing possible publication bias. Furthermore, narrative synthesis may be subject to greater confirmation bias. Conclusion and implications: There is no "one-size fits all" approach to enhancing EBP implementation; assessing organisational culture prior to designing interventions is crucial. Although some interventions appear promising, further research is required to explore the most effective methods of supporting physiotherapists' adoption of EBP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-219
Number of pages12
JournalPhysiotherapy
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Physical Therapists
Organizational Culture
Publication Bias
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Research
Nursing
Language
Databases

Cite this

@article{3e68195e629f420dae2b63db7e6182fd,
title = "Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions",
abstract = "Background: Despite clear benefits of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach to ensuring quality and consistency of care, its uptake within physiotherapy has been inconsistent. Objectives: Synthesise the findings of research into EBP barriers, facilitators and interventions in physiotherapy and identify methods of enhancing adoption and implementation. Data sources: Literature concerning physiotherapists' practice between 2000 and 2012 was systematically searched using: Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, American Psychological Association databases, Medline, Journal Storage, and Science Direct. Reference lists were searched to identify additional studies. Study selection: Thirty-two studies, focusing either on physiotherapists' EBP knowledge, attitudes or implementation, or EBP interventions in physiotherapy were included. Data extraction and synthesis: One author undertook all data extraction and a second author reviewed to ensure consistency and rigour. Synthesis was organised around the themes of EBP barriers/enablers, attitudes, knowledge/skills, use and interventions. Results: Many physiotherapists hold positive attitudes towards EBP. However, this does not necessarily translate into consistent, high-quality EBP. Many barriers to EBP implementation are apparent, including: lack of time and skills, and misperceptions of EBP. Limitations: Only studies published in the English language, in peer-reviewed journals were included, thereby introducing possible publication bias. Furthermore, narrative synthesis may be subject to greater confirmation bias. Conclusion and implications: There is no {"}one-size fits all{"} approach to enhancing EBP implementation; assessing organisational culture prior to designing interventions is crucial. Although some interventions appear promising, further research is required to explore the most effective methods of supporting physiotherapists' adoption of EBP.",
keywords = "Evidence-Based Practice, Physiotherapists, Best Practices, Review, Decision Making, Practice-Research Gap, Decision making, Evidence-based practice, Best practices, Practice-research gap",
author = "Laura Evans and Penney Upton and Dominic UPTON",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "208--219",
journal = "Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)",
issn = "0031-9406",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. / Evans, Laura; Upton, Penney; UPTON, Dominic.

In: Physiotherapy, Vol. 100, No. 3, 2014, p. 208-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evidence-Based Practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions

AU - Evans, Laura

AU - Upton, Penney

AU - UPTON, Dominic

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background: Despite clear benefits of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach to ensuring quality and consistency of care, its uptake within physiotherapy has been inconsistent. Objectives: Synthesise the findings of research into EBP barriers, facilitators and interventions in physiotherapy and identify methods of enhancing adoption and implementation. Data sources: Literature concerning physiotherapists' practice between 2000 and 2012 was systematically searched using: Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, American Psychological Association databases, Medline, Journal Storage, and Science Direct. Reference lists were searched to identify additional studies. Study selection: Thirty-two studies, focusing either on physiotherapists' EBP knowledge, attitudes or implementation, or EBP interventions in physiotherapy were included. Data extraction and synthesis: One author undertook all data extraction and a second author reviewed to ensure consistency and rigour. Synthesis was organised around the themes of EBP barriers/enablers, attitudes, knowledge/skills, use and interventions. Results: Many physiotherapists hold positive attitudes towards EBP. However, this does not necessarily translate into consistent, high-quality EBP. Many barriers to EBP implementation are apparent, including: lack of time and skills, and misperceptions of EBP. Limitations: Only studies published in the English language, in peer-reviewed journals were included, thereby introducing possible publication bias. Furthermore, narrative synthesis may be subject to greater confirmation bias. Conclusion and implications: There is no "one-size fits all" approach to enhancing EBP implementation; assessing organisational culture prior to designing interventions is crucial. Although some interventions appear promising, further research is required to explore the most effective methods of supporting physiotherapists' adoption of EBP.

AB - Background: Despite clear benefits of the Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) approach to ensuring quality and consistency of care, its uptake within physiotherapy has been inconsistent. Objectives: Synthesise the findings of research into EBP barriers, facilitators and interventions in physiotherapy and identify methods of enhancing adoption and implementation. Data sources: Literature concerning physiotherapists' practice between 2000 and 2012 was systematically searched using: Academic Search Complete, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, American Psychological Association databases, Medline, Journal Storage, and Science Direct. Reference lists were searched to identify additional studies. Study selection: Thirty-two studies, focusing either on physiotherapists' EBP knowledge, attitudes or implementation, or EBP interventions in physiotherapy were included. Data extraction and synthesis: One author undertook all data extraction and a second author reviewed to ensure consistency and rigour. Synthesis was organised around the themes of EBP barriers/enablers, attitudes, knowledge/skills, use and interventions. Results: Many physiotherapists hold positive attitudes towards EBP. However, this does not necessarily translate into consistent, high-quality EBP. Many barriers to EBP implementation are apparent, including: lack of time and skills, and misperceptions of EBP. Limitations: Only studies published in the English language, in peer-reviewed journals were included, thereby introducing possible publication bias. Furthermore, narrative synthesis may be subject to greater confirmation bias. Conclusion and implications: There is no "one-size fits all" approach to enhancing EBP implementation; assessing organisational culture prior to designing interventions is crucial. Although some interventions appear promising, further research is required to explore the most effective methods of supporting physiotherapists' adoption of EBP.

KW - Evidence-Based Practice

KW - Physiotherapists

KW - Best Practices

KW - Review

KW - Decision Making

KW - Practice-Research Gap

KW - Decision making

KW - Evidence-based practice

KW - Best practices

KW - Practice-research gap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905051331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/evidencebased-practice-physiotherapy-systematic-review-barriers-enablers-interventions-1

U2 - 10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.physio.2014.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 208

EP - 219

JO - Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)

JF - Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)

SN - 0031-9406

IS - 3

ER -