TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for commonly used teaching, learning and assessment methods in contact lens clinical skills education
AU - Woods, Craig
AU - Naroo, Shehzad
AU - Zeri, Fabrizio
AU - Bakkar, May
AU - Barodawala, Fakhruddin
AU - Evans, Vicki
AU - Fadel, Daddi
AU - Kalikivayi, Lavanya
AU - Lira, Madalena
AU - Maseedupally, Vinod
AU - Huarte, Sonia Trave
AU - Eperjesi, Frank
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 British Contact Lens Association
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Introduction: Evidence based practice is now an important part of healthcare education. The aim of this narrative literature review was to determine what evidence exists on the efficacy of commonly used teaching and learning and assessment methods in the realm of contact lens skills education (CLE) in order to provide insights into best practice. A summary of the global regulation and provision of postgraduate learning and continuing professional development in CLE is included. Method: An expert panel of educators was recruited and completed a literature review of current evidence of teaching and learning and assessment methods in healthcare training, with an emphasis on health care, general optometry and CLE. Results: No direct evidence of benefit of teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE were found. There was evidence for the benefit of some teaching and learning and assessment methods in other disciplines that could be transferable to CLE and could help students meet the intended learning outcomes. There was evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; clinical teaching and learning, flipped classrooms, clinical skills videos and clerkships. For assessment these methods were; essays, case presentations, objective structured clinical examinations, self-assessment and formative assessment. There was no evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; journal clubs and case discussions. Nor was any evidence found for the following assessment methods; multiple-choice questions, oral examinations, objective structured practical examinations, holistic assessment, and summative assessment. Conclusion: Investigation into the efficacy of common teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE are required and would be beneficial for the entire community of contact lens educators, and other disciplines that wish to adapt this approach of evidence-based teaching.
AB - Introduction: Evidence based practice is now an important part of healthcare education. The aim of this narrative literature review was to determine what evidence exists on the efficacy of commonly used teaching and learning and assessment methods in the realm of contact lens skills education (CLE) in order to provide insights into best practice. A summary of the global regulation and provision of postgraduate learning and continuing professional development in CLE is included. Method: An expert panel of educators was recruited and completed a literature review of current evidence of teaching and learning and assessment methods in healthcare training, with an emphasis on health care, general optometry and CLE. Results: No direct evidence of benefit of teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE were found. There was evidence for the benefit of some teaching and learning and assessment methods in other disciplines that could be transferable to CLE and could help students meet the intended learning outcomes. There was evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; clinical teaching and learning, flipped classrooms, clinical skills videos and clerkships. For assessment these methods were; essays, case presentations, objective structured clinical examinations, self-assessment and formative assessment. There was no evidence that the following teaching and learning methods helped health-care and general optometry students meet the intended learning outcomes; journal clubs and case discussions. Nor was any evidence found for the following assessment methods; multiple-choice questions, oral examinations, objective structured practical examinations, holistic assessment, and summative assessment. Conclusion: Investigation into the efficacy of common teaching and learning and assessment methods in CLE are required and would be beneficial for the entire community of contact lens educators, and other disciplines that wish to adapt this approach of evidence-based teaching.
KW - Blended learning
KW - Case-based learning
KW - Clinical training
KW - Contact lens
KW - Evidence-based teaching
KW - Group work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148373947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101821
DO - 10.1016/j.clae.2023.101821
M3 - Article
C2 - 36805277
AN - SCOPUS:85148373947
SN - 1367-0484
VL - 46
SP - 1
EP - 10
JO - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
JF - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
IS - 2
M1 - 101821
ER -