TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining adherence to activity monitoring devices to improve physical activity in adults with cardiovascular disease
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Marin, Tania S.
AU - Kourbelis, Constance
AU - Foote, Jonathon
AU - Newman, Peter
AU - Brown, Alex
AU - Daniel, Mark
AU - Coffee, Neil T.
AU - Nicholls, Stephen J.
AU - Ganesan, Anand
AU - Versace, Vincent L.
AU - Beks, Hannah
AU - Haedtke, Christine A.
AU - Clark, Robyn A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by a National Heart Foundation of Australia Vanguard Grant, Award ID 101443 and supported by a Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (App ID: 100847).
Publisher Copyright:
© The European Society of Cardiology 2018.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - Background: Activity monitoring devices are currently being used to facilitate and monitor physical activity. No prior review has examined adherence to the use of activity monitoring devices amongst adults with cardiovascular disease. Methods: Literature from June 2012 to October 2017 was evaluated to examine the extent of adherence to any activity monitoring device used to collect objective physical activity data. Randomized control trials comparing usual care against the use of an activity monitoring device, in a community intervention for adults from any cardiovascular diagnostic group, were included. A systematic search of databases and clinical trials registers was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Results: Of 10 eligible studies, two studies reported pedometer use and eight accelerometer use. Six studies addressed the primary outcome. Mean adherence was 59.1% (range 39.6% to 85.7%) at last follow-up. Studies lacked equal representation by gender (28.6% female) and age (range 42 to 82 years). Conclusion: This review indicates that current research on activity monitoring devices may be overstated due to the variability in adherence. Results showed that physical activity tracking in women and in young adults have been understudied.
AB - Background: Activity monitoring devices are currently being used to facilitate and monitor physical activity. No prior review has examined adherence to the use of activity monitoring devices amongst adults with cardiovascular disease. Methods: Literature from June 2012 to October 2017 was evaluated to examine the extent of adherence to any activity monitoring device used to collect objective physical activity data. Randomized control trials comparing usual care against the use of an activity monitoring device, in a community intervention for adults from any cardiovascular diagnostic group, were included. A systematic search of databases and clinical trials registers was conducted using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Results: Of 10 eligible studies, two studies reported pedometer use and eight accelerometer use. Six studies addressed the primary outcome. Mean adherence was 59.1% (range 39.6% to 85.7%) at last follow-up. Studies lacked equal representation by gender (28.6% female) and age (range 42 to 82 years). Conclusion: This review indicates that current research on activity monitoring devices may be overstated due to the variability in adherence. Results showed that physical activity tracking in women and in young adults have been understudied.
KW - accelerometer
KW - activity monitoring device
KW - Adherence
KW - pedometers
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060105842&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/examining-adherence-activity-monitoring-devices-improve-physical-activity-adults-cardiovascular-dise
U2 - 10.1177/2047487318805580
DO - 10.1177/2047487318805580
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060105842
SN - 2047-4873
VL - 26
SP - 382
EP - 397
JO - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
JF - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -