Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type: A preliminary study

Ian Mathieson, Dominic Upton, Trevor D. Prior

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rationale that subtalar joint position, reflected by calcaneal alignment, determines foot morphology was used to formulate an approach to examination of the validity of three measures of "foot type": the Staheli Arch Index, the Chippaux-Smirak Index, and navicular height. Each measure was calculated in five positions, progressively inverting from a reference position of maximal comfortable eversion. Pearson product moment correlations (Staheli Arch Index: r = 0.5; Chippaux-Smirak Index: r = 0.6; and navicular height: r = 0.8) indicated that each measure progressively increased with inversion. The change in calcaneal position required to produce significant changes in each measure was investigated using analysis of variance with Scheffé post hoc analysis. This analysis revealed that changes of 15° and 20° were required to produce significant differences in Chippaux-Smirak Index and Staheli Arch Index scores, respectively, threatening their validity. Navicular height was sensitive to smaller changes of 10° and thus displays greater sensitivity to changes in calcaneal position than the footprint parameters tested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-281
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume94
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the validity of selected measures of foot type: A preliminary study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this