Exclusion by design

Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion

Sora PARK, John Campbell, Justine Humphry, Gerard Goggin

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Abstract

Abstract

Recent developments in smart technologies that seamlessly link the networks and user-generated data via tracking tools and algorithms, have added another dimension to the unequal distribution of digital benefits. Algorithmic processing assigns categorical meaning to data that users generate during their online and digital activities, without direct participation of the users. The designs of algorithms often have a specific purpose, which may not result in equal benefits to users, creating algorithmic discrimination. We contextualise this issue within the social and digital exclusion frame, where the lack of digital engagement creates new forms of disadvantage while reinforcing existing social inequalities. The aim of this paper is to investigate how automated digital tools that aim to provide better services to users are linked to the existing issues of social and digital exclusion. Are there exclusionary practices that are built in the algorithmic design that generate users’ data? How are these systems led by existing perceptions and biases that exclude certain forms of participating? What are the potential consequences of the entanglement between inclusion of data and exclusionary practices? In order to investigate the interplay between social, digital and data exclusion, we adopt a case study approach where we examine how exclusionary practices are embedded in the design of welfare services; Australian Government’s Centrelink automated debt recovery system, Department of Human Services client avatar ‘Nadia’ and Cashless welfare card. We examine how asymmetry in data access, control and use result in exclusionary practices at the design stage of tools that are intended to improve user interactions with services.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-1
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2018
EventData Justice Conference - Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Duration: 21 May 201822 May 2018

Conference

ConferenceData Justice Conference
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityCardiff
Period21/05/1822/05/18

Fingerprint

Access control
Recovery
Processing

Cite this

PARK, S., Campbell, J., Humphry, J., & Goggin, G. (2018). Exclusion by design: Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion. 1-1. Abstract from Data Justice Conference, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
PARK, Sora ; Campbell, John ; Humphry, Justine ; Goggin, Gerard. / Exclusion by design : Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion. Abstract from Data Justice Conference, Cardiff, United Kingdom.1 p.
@conference{b9e4df7b28e845088c20853d41e4595c,
title = "Exclusion by design: Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion",
abstract = "Recent developments in smart technologies that seamlessly link the networks and user-generated data via tracking tools and algorithms, have added another dimension to the unequal distribution of digital benefits. Algorithmic processing assigns categorical meaning to data that users generate during their online and digital activities, without direct participation of the users. The designs of algorithms often have a specific purpose, which may not result in equal benefits to users, creating algorithmic discrimination. We contextualise this issue within the social and digital exclusion frame, where the lack of digital engagement creates new forms of disadvantage while reinforcing existing social inequalities. The aim of this paper is to investigate how automated digital tools that aim to provide better services to users are linked to the existing issues of social and digital exclusion. Are there exclusionary practices that are built in the algorithmic design that generate users’ data? How are these systems led by existing perceptions and biases that exclude certain forms of participating? What are the potential consequences of the entanglement between inclusion of data and exclusionary practices? In order to investigate the interplay between social, digital and data exclusion, we adopt a case study approach where we examine how exclusionary practices are embedded in the design of welfare services; Australian Government’s Centrelink automated debt recovery system, Department of Human Services client avatar ‘Nadia’ and Cashless welfare card. We examine how asymmetry in data access, control and use result in exclusionary practices at the design stage of tools that are intended to improve user interactions with services.",
author = "Sora PARK and John Campbell and Justine Humphry and Gerard Goggin",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
pages = "1--1",
note = "Data Justice Conference ; Conference date: 21-05-2018 Through 22-05-2018",

}

PARK, S, Campbell, J, Humphry, J & Goggin, G 2018, 'Exclusion by design: Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion' Data Justice Conference, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 21/05/18 - 22/05/18, pp. 1-1.

Exclusion by design : Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion. / PARK, Sora; Campbell, John; Humphry, Justine; Goggin, Gerard.

2018. 1-1 Abstract from Data Justice Conference, Cardiff, United Kingdom.

Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Abstract

TY - CONF

T1 - Exclusion by design

T2 - Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion

AU - PARK, Sora

AU - Campbell, John

AU - Humphry, Justine

AU - Goggin, Gerard

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Recent developments in smart technologies that seamlessly link the networks and user-generated data via tracking tools and algorithms, have added another dimension to the unequal distribution of digital benefits. Algorithmic processing assigns categorical meaning to data that users generate during their online and digital activities, without direct participation of the users. The designs of algorithms often have a specific purpose, which may not result in equal benefits to users, creating algorithmic discrimination. We contextualise this issue within the social and digital exclusion frame, where the lack of digital engagement creates new forms of disadvantage while reinforcing existing social inequalities. The aim of this paper is to investigate how automated digital tools that aim to provide better services to users are linked to the existing issues of social and digital exclusion. Are there exclusionary practices that are built in the algorithmic design that generate users’ data? How are these systems led by existing perceptions and biases that exclude certain forms of participating? What are the potential consequences of the entanglement between inclusion of data and exclusionary practices? In order to investigate the interplay between social, digital and data exclusion, we adopt a case study approach where we examine how exclusionary practices are embedded in the design of welfare services; Australian Government’s Centrelink automated debt recovery system, Department of Human Services client avatar ‘Nadia’ and Cashless welfare card. We examine how asymmetry in data access, control and use result in exclusionary practices at the design stage of tools that are intended to improve user interactions with services.

AB - Recent developments in smart technologies that seamlessly link the networks and user-generated data via tracking tools and algorithms, have added another dimension to the unequal distribution of digital benefits. Algorithmic processing assigns categorical meaning to data that users generate during their online and digital activities, without direct participation of the users. The designs of algorithms often have a specific purpose, which may not result in equal benefits to users, creating algorithmic discrimination. We contextualise this issue within the social and digital exclusion frame, where the lack of digital engagement creates new forms of disadvantage while reinforcing existing social inequalities. The aim of this paper is to investigate how automated digital tools that aim to provide better services to users are linked to the existing issues of social and digital exclusion. Are there exclusionary practices that are built in the algorithmic design that generate users’ data? How are these systems led by existing perceptions and biases that exclude certain forms of participating? What are the potential consequences of the entanglement between inclusion of data and exclusionary practices? In order to investigate the interplay between social, digital and data exclusion, we adopt a case study approach where we examine how exclusionary practices are embedded in the design of welfare services; Australian Government’s Centrelink automated debt recovery system, Department of Human Services client avatar ‘Nadia’ and Cashless welfare card. We examine how asymmetry in data access, control and use result in exclusionary practices at the design stage of tools that are intended to improve user interactions with services.

UR - https://datajusticelab.org/data-justice-conference/data-justice-2018/

M3 - Abstract

SP - 1

EP - 1

ER -

PARK S, Campbell J, Humphry J, Goggin G. Exclusion by design: Exploring the links between social, digital and data exclusion. 2018. Abstract from Data Justice Conference, Cardiff, United Kingdom.