Expanding the Political Psychology Toolkit: The Potential of Discursive Psychology for Understanding Contentious Political Debate at a Grassroots Level

Shannon CLARK, Linda BOTTERILL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In its location at the intersection of political science and psychology, political psychology draws on many of the research techniques of both disciplines in its exploration of power, voting behavior, leadership, attitudes, and values. One hitherto relatively underutilized approach for understanding public policy debate is discursive psychology (DP). Applying this perspective to a contentious policy issue in Australia, we seek to demonstrate that this approach can add richness and depth to our understanding of how ordinary citizens engage in public policy debates. We suggest that this type of analysis can augment insights obtained from more traditional methods-such as focus groups, experimental approaches, and opinion polling-by analyzing how debates are constructed and presented at the grassroots level. This research is innovative in two ways. First, it applies a rigorous, empirical research approach to an area in which it has not previously been used: the study of public policy issues. Second, rather than analyzing the communicative practices of political leaders, we consider the rhetorical arguments made by ordinary citizens in their engagement with political issues and how they negotiate what counts as evidence. This can provide insights into how public debate can be conducted more productively and respectfully. © 2017 International Society of Political Psychology.
LanguageEnglish
Pages667-683
Number of pages17
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

political psychology
Public Policy
public policy
psychology
Psychology
citizen
Empirical Research
voting behavior
Politics
research approach
Focus Groups
political science
research method
empirical research
Research Design
leadership
leader
Research
evidence
Discursive Psychology

Cite this

@article{933dc9cd4f844092ae9c8cec0fa3aa14,
title = "Expanding the Political Psychology Toolkit: The Potential of Discursive Psychology for Understanding Contentious Political Debate at a Grassroots Level",
abstract = "In its location at the intersection of political science and psychology, political psychology draws on many of the research techniques of both disciplines in its exploration of power, voting behavior, leadership, attitudes, and values. One hitherto relatively underutilized approach for understanding public policy debate is discursive psychology (DP). Applying this perspective to a contentious policy issue in Australia, we seek to demonstrate that this approach can add richness and depth to our understanding of how ordinary citizens engage in public policy debates. We suggest that this type of analysis can augment insights obtained from more traditional methods-such as focus groups, experimental approaches, and opinion polling-by analyzing how debates are constructed and presented at the grassroots level. This research is innovative in two ways. First, it applies a rigorous, empirical research approach to an area in which it has not previously been used: the study of public policy issues. Second, rather than analyzing the communicative practices of political leaders, we consider the rhetorical arguments made by ordinary citizens in their engagement with political issues and how they negotiate what counts as evidence. This can provide insights into how public debate can be conducted more productively and respectfully. {\circledC} 2017 International Society of Political Psychology.",
keywords = "Australia, Discursive psychology, Public policy, Wind farms",
author = "Shannon CLARK and Linda BOTTERILL",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/pops.12443",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "667--683",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expanding the Political Psychology Toolkit: The Potential of Discursive Psychology for Understanding Contentious Political Debate at a Grassroots Level

AU - CLARK, Shannon

AU - BOTTERILL, Linda

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - In its location at the intersection of political science and psychology, political psychology draws on many of the research techniques of both disciplines in its exploration of power, voting behavior, leadership, attitudes, and values. One hitherto relatively underutilized approach for understanding public policy debate is discursive psychology (DP). Applying this perspective to a contentious policy issue in Australia, we seek to demonstrate that this approach can add richness and depth to our understanding of how ordinary citizens engage in public policy debates. We suggest that this type of analysis can augment insights obtained from more traditional methods-such as focus groups, experimental approaches, and opinion polling-by analyzing how debates are constructed and presented at the grassroots level. This research is innovative in two ways. First, it applies a rigorous, empirical research approach to an area in which it has not previously been used: the study of public policy issues. Second, rather than analyzing the communicative practices of political leaders, we consider the rhetorical arguments made by ordinary citizens in their engagement with political issues and how they negotiate what counts as evidence. This can provide insights into how public debate can be conducted more productively and respectfully. © 2017 International Society of Political Psychology.

AB - In its location at the intersection of political science and psychology, political psychology draws on many of the research techniques of both disciplines in its exploration of power, voting behavior, leadership, attitudes, and values. One hitherto relatively underutilized approach for understanding public policy debate is discursive psychology (DP). Applying this perspective to a contentious policy issue in Australia, we seek to demonstrate that this approach can add richness and depth to our understanding of how ordinary citizens engage in public policy debates. We suggest that this type of analysis can augment insights obtained from more traditional methods-such as focus groups, experimental approaches, and opinion polling-by analyzing how debates are constructed and presented at the grassroots level. This research is innovative in two ways. First, it applies a rigorous, empirical research approach to an area in which it has not previously been used: the study of public policy issues. Second, rather than analyzing the communicative practices of political leaders, we consider the rhetorical arguments made by ordinary citizens in their engagement with political issues and how they negotiate what counts as evidence. This can provide insights into how public debate can be conducted more productively and respectfully. © 2017 International Society of Political Psychology.

KW - Australia

KW - Discursive psychology

KW - Public policy

KW - Wind farms

U2 - 10.1111/pops.12443

DO - 10.1111/pops.12443

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 667

EP - 683

JO - Political Psychology

T2 - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 3

ER -