Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part two

C. E. Prentice, L. Chipchase

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The evaluation of patients’ functional outcome and mobility status is of critical importance to all physiotherapists, including those practising in acute care. However, the difficulty in attributing aspects of improvement to physiotherapy intervention has made outcome measurement a complex process. Furthermore, a general literature search failed to identify an immediately appropriate evaluative outcome measure to guide physiotherapists’ reasoning or monitor patients’ in the acute care setting. Without adequate instruments to measure intervention efficacy for clinical and research purposes, it is difficult to implement evidence-based practice. Part two of this article series presents findings on outcome measurement derived from the focused ethnography in-depth interview methodology described in part one. Recommendations to improve physiotherapists’ functional outcome evaluation in acute care are discussed. The use of individualized/ patient-specific measures of either items of impairment or activity limitation are suggested, as scored from the physiotherapists’ perspective.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)395-399
    Number of pages5
    JournalInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
    Volume13
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2006

    Fingerprint

    Physical Therapists
    Cultural Anthropology
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Interviews
    Clinical Decision-Making
    Research

    Cite this

    @article{a8d3cf9ab95e456d92a686445549cad7,
    title = "Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part two",
    abstract = "The evaluation of patients’ functional outcome and mobility status is of critical importance to all physiotherapists, including those practising in acute care. However, the difficulty in attributing aspects of improvement to physiotherapy intervention has made outcome measurement a complex process. Furthermore, a general literature search failed to identify an immediately appropriate evaluative outcome measure to guide physiotherapists’ reasoning or monitor patients’ in the acute care setting. Without adequate instruments to measure intervention efficacy for clinical and research purposes, it is difficult to implement evidence-based practice. Part two of this article series presents findings on outcome measurement derived from the focused ethnography in-depth interview methodology described in part one. Recommendations to improve physiotherapists’ functional outcome evaluation in acute care are discussed. The use of individualized/ patient-specific measures of either items of impairment or activity limitation are suggested, as scored from the physiotherapists’ perspective.",
    keywords = "Acute care, Interviews, Outcome measurement, Physiotherapy",
    author = "Prentice, {C. E.} and L. Chipchase",
    year = "2006",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.9.21783",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "395--399",
    journal = "International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation",
    issn = "1354-8581",
    publisher = "Mark Allen Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "9",

    }

    Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part two. / Prentice, C. E.; Chipchase, L.

    In: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 9, 01.09.2006, p. 395-399.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part two

    AU - Prentice, C. E.

    AU - Chipchase, L.

    PY - 2006/9/1

    Y1 - 2006/9/1

    N2 - The evaluation of patients’ functional outcome and mobility status is of critical importance to all physiotherapists, including those practising in acute care. However, the difficulty in attributing aspects of improvement to physiotherapy intervention has made outcome measurement a complex process. Furthermore, a general literature search failed to identify an immediately appropriate evaluative outcome measure to guide physiotherapists’ reasoning or monitor patients’ in the acute care setting. Without adequate instruments to measure intervention efficacy for clinical and research purposes, it is difficult to implement evidence-based practice. Part two of this article series presents findings on outcome measurement derived from the focused ethnography in-depth interview methodology described in part one. Recommendations to improve physiotherapists’ functional outcome evaluation in acute care are discussed. The use of individualized/ patient-specific measures of either items of impairment or activity limitation are suggested, as scored from the physiotherapists’ perspective.

    AB - The evaluation of patients’ functional outcome and mobility status is of critical importance to all physiotherapists, including those practising in acute care. However, the difficulty in attributing aspects of improvement to physiotherapy intervention has made outcome measurement a complex process. Furthermore, a general literature search failed to identify an immediately appropriate evaluative outcome measure to guide physiotherapists’ reasoning or monitor patients’ in the acute care setting. Without adequate instruments to measure intervention efficacy for clinical and research purposes, it is difficult to implement evidence-based practice. Part two of this article series presents findings on outcome measurement derived from the focused ethnography in-depth interview methodology described in part one. Recommendations to improve physiotherapists’ functional outcome evaluation in acute care are discussed. The use of individualized/ patient-specific measures of either items of impairment or activity limitation are suggested, as scored from the physiotherapists’ perspective.

    KW - Acute care

    KW - Interviews

    KW - Outcome measurement

    KW - Physiotherapy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958504670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.9.21783

    DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.9.21783

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 395

    EP - 399

    JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

    JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

    SN - 1354-8581

    IS - 9

    ER -