Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part one

L. Chipchase, C. E. Prentice

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In the current health care climate physiotherapists working in acute hospitals are not exempt from evidence-based practice pressures. Clinicians are required to incorporate clinical expertise with patient values and the best available evidence. As physiotherapists are ideally placed to intervene in the management of acutely ill inpatients, who are at a high-risk of complications, the decision-making process for the commonly performed task of mobilization requires understanding. Presented in part one of this series are the indicators expert Australian acute care physiotherapists’ used in decision-making to determine patient capacity for mobilization. Part two presents and applies study findings to functional outcome evaluation. A focused ethnography using an in-depth interview with 12 acute care physiotherapists was employed to address this. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. No single indicator was used in participants’ decision-making to determine patients’ capacity for mobilization. Rather, numerous indicators were incorporated throughout a fluid, individualized and task-specific assessment and treatment process.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)343-350
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
    Volume13
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

    Fingerprint

    Physical Therapists
    Decision Making
    Interviews
    Cultural Anthropology
    Process Assessment (Health Care)
    Evidence-Based Practice
    Climate
    Inpatients
    Delivery of Health Care
    Pressure
    Clinical Decision-Making
    Therapeutics

    Cite this

    @article{5b1904e6868a4a37aa5d286934598950,
    title = "Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part one",
    abstract = "In the current health care climate physiotherapists working in acute hospitals are not exempt from evidence-based practice pressures. Clinicians are required to incorporate clinical expertise with patient values and the best available evidence. As physiotherapists are ideally placed to intervene in the management of acutely ill inpatients, who are at a high-risk of complications, the decision-making process for the commonly performed task of mobilization requires understanding. Presented in part one of this series are the indicators expert Australian acute care physiotherapists’ used in decision-making to determine patient capacity for mobilization. Part two presents and applies study findings to functional outcome evaluation. A focused ethnography using an in-depth interview with 12 acute care physiotherapists was employed to address this. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. No single indicator was used in participants’ decision-making to determine patients’ capacity for mobilization. Rather, numerous indicators were incorporated throughout a fluid, individualized and task-specific assessment and treatment process.",
    keywords = "Acute care, Decision-making, Physiotherapy",
    author = "L. Chipchase and Prentice, {C. E.}",
    year = "2006",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.8.343",
    language = "English",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "343--350",
    journal = "International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation",
    issn = "1354-8581",
    publisher = "Mark Allen Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "8",

    }

    Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part one. / Chipchase, L.; Prentice, C. E.

    In: International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, Vol. 13, No. 8, 01.08.2006, p. 343-350.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Expert physiotherapists’ clinical decision-making in acute care. Part one

    AU - Chipchase, L.

    AU - Prentice, C. E.

    PY - 2006/8/1

    Y1 - 2006/8/1

    N2 - In the current health care climate physiotherapists working in acute hospitals are not exempt from evidence-based practice pressures. Clinicians are required to incorporate clinical expertise with patient values and the best available evidence. As physiotherapists are ideally placed to intervene in the management of acutely ill inpatients, who are at a high-risk of complications, the decision-making process for the commonly performed task of mobilization requires understanding. Presented in part one of this series are the indicators expert Australian acute care physiotherapists’ used in decision-making to determine patient capacity for mobilization. Part two presents and applies study findings to functional outcome evaluation. A focused ethnography using an in-depth interview with 12 acute care physiotherapists was employed to address this. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. No single indicator was used in participants’ decision-making to determine patients’ capacity for mobilization. Rather, numerous indicators were incorporated throughout a fluid, individualized and task-specific assessment and treatment process.

    AB - In the current health care climate physiotherapists working in acute hospitals are not exempt from evidence-based practice pressures. Clinicians are required to incorporate clinical expertise with patient values and the best available evidence. As physiotherapists are ideally placed to intervene in the management of acutely ill inpatients, who are at a high-risk of complications, the decision-making process for the commonly performed task of mobilization requires understanding. Presented in part one of this series are the indicators expert Australian acute care physiotherapists’ used in decision-making to determine patient capacity for mobilization. Part two presents and applies study findings to functional outcome evaluation. A focused ethnography using an in-depth interview with 12 acute care physiotherapists was employed to address this. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically. No single indicator was used in participants’ decision-making to determine patients’ capacity for mobilization. Rather, numerous indicators were incorporated throughout a fluid, individualized and task-specific assessment and treatment process.

    KW - Acute care

    KW - Decision-making

    KW - Physiotherapy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929854301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.8.343

    DO - 10.12968/ijtr.2006.13.8.343

    M3 - Article

    VL - 13

    SP - 343

    EP - 350

    JO - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

    JF - International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

    SN - 1354-8581

    IS - 8

    ER -