Explaining the “ebb and flow” of the problem stream: frame conflicts over the future of coal seam gas (“fracking”) in Australia

Paul Fawcett, Michael J. Jensen, Hedda Ransan-Cooper, Sonya Duus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why do issues “fade” from the problem stream? This is an important but underresearched question, which this article examines by looking at the dynamic interaction between frames and frame sponsors. We develop a novel methodological approach that combines algorithmic coding (topic modelling) with hand-coding to track changes in the presence of frames and frame sponsors during periods of intense problematisation (“problem windows”) both within continuous contexts and diachronically across different contexts. We apply this approach empirically in a corpus of newspaper articles that pertain to the coal seam gas controversy in Australia – a divisive policy issue where frame conflicts are common. We find that elite actors have a particularly decisive impact on the problem stream in terms of both the evolution and duration of debate. Further, problem windows close in response to three different mechanisms: elite frame convergence; public statements (by government and industry); and elections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Public Policy
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 May 2018

Fingerprint

coal
coal seam
election
gas
coding
elite
industry
modeling
newspaper
conflict
hydraulic fracturing
interaction
policy
public

Cite this

@article{2f19db950e804c708966071a93e09a9a,
title = "Explaining the “ebb and flow” of the problem stream: frame conflicts over the future of coal seam gas (“fracking”) in Australia",
abstract = "Why do issues “fade” from the problem stream? This is an important but underresearched question, which this article examines by looking at the dynamic interaction between frames and frame sponsors. We develop a novel methodological approach that combines algorithmic coding (topic modelling) with hand-coding to track changes in the presence of frames and frame sponsors during periods of intense problematisation (“problem windows”) both within continuous contexts and diachronically across different contexts. We apply this approach empirically in a corpus of newspaper articles that pertain to the coal seam gas controversy in Australia – a divisive policy issue where frame conflicts are common. We find that elite actors have a particularly decisive impact on the problem stream in terms of both the evolution and duration of debate. Further, problem windows close in response to three different mechanisms: elite frame convergence; public statements (by government and industry); and elections.",
keywords = "coal seam gas, fracking, framing, multiple streams framework, problem stream, topic modelling",
author = "Paul Fawcett and Jensen, {Michael J.} and Hedda Ransan-Cooper and Sonya Duus",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1017/S0143814X18000132",
language = "English",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Journal of Public Policy",
issn = "0143-814X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Explaining the “ebb and flow” of the problem stream: frame conflicts over the future of coal seam gas (“fracking”) in Australia. / Fawcett, Paul; Jensen, Michael J.; Ransan-Cooper, Hedda; Duus, Sonya.

In: Journal of Public Policy, 16.05.2018, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explaining the “ebb and flow” of the problem stream: frame conflicts over the future of coal seam gas (“fracking”) in Australia

AU - Fawcett, Paul

AU - Jensen, Michael J.

AU - Ransan-Cooper, Hedda

AU - Duus, Sonya

PY - 2018/5/16

Y1 - 2018/5/16

N2 - Why do issues “fade” from the problem stream? This is an important but underresearched question, which this article examines by looking at the dynamic interaction between frames and frame sponsors. We develop a novel methodological approach that combines algorithmic coding (topic modelling) with hand-coding to track changes in the presence of frames and frame sponsors during periods of intense problematisation (“problem windows”) both within continuous contexts and diachronically across different contexts. We apply this approach empirically in a corpus of newspaper articles that pertain to the coal seam gas controversy in Australia – a divisive policy issue where frame conflicts are common. We find that elite actors have a particularly decisive impact on the problem stream in terms of both the evolution and duration of debate. Further, problem windows close in response to three different mechanisms: elite frame convergence; public statements (by government and industry); and elections.

AB - Why do issues “fade” from the problem stream? This is an important but underresearched question, which this article examines by looking at the dynamic interaction between frames and frame sponsors. We develop a novel methodological approach that combines algorithmic coding (topic modelling) with hand-coding to track changes in the presence of frames and frame sponsors during periods of intense problematisation (“problem windows”) both within continuous contexts and diachronically across different contexts. We apply this approach empirically in a corpus of newspaper articles that pertain to the coal seam gas controversy in Australia – a divisive policy issue where frame conflicts are common. We find that elite actors have a particularly decisive impact on the problem stream in terms of both the evolution and duration of debate. Further, problem windows close in response to three different mechanisms: elite frame convergence; public statements (by government and industry); and elections.

KW - coal seam gas

KW - fracking

KW - framing

KW - multiple streams framework

KW - problem stream

KW - topic modelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047156293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0143814X18000132

DO - 10.1017/S0143814X18000132

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Public Policy

JF - Journal of Public Policy

SN - 0143-814X

ER -