Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union

Benjamin LERUTH, Stefan Ganzle, Jarle Trondal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the aftermath of the British referendum to leave the European Union and the European Commission’s ‘White Paper on the Future of Europe’, it is not only time to take stock of the existing literature on differentiated integration, but also to rethink the perimeters of disintegration. We argue that phenomena such as Brexit embrace forms of differentiation which trigger the need for conceptualizing differentiated disintegration altogether. This article first sketches the path of the scholarly debate in a chronological way to grasp the breadth of existing literature. Second, it discusses differentiated disintegration as a potentially new area for research. Mapping several scenarios for future research, we propose that differentiated (dis)integration needs to be conceived as a negotiated, but profoundly path-dependent process, which is structurally locked-in, and deeply conditioned by pre-existing organizations and institutions of European integration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1013-1030
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
Volume57
Issue number5
Early online date22 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2019

Fingerprint

Organization and Institution
referendum
European integration
European Commission
European Union
Disintegration
scenario
literature
Referendum
Scenarios
Trigger
time

Cite this

LERUTH, Benjamin ; Ganzle, Stefan ; Trondal, Jarle. / Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union. In: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 5. pp. 1013-1030.
@article{72845d37951441448886b5b5bb1f0b88,
title = "Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union",
abstract = "In the aftermath of the British referendum to leave the European Union and the European Commission’s ‘White Paper on the Future of Europe’, it is not only time to take stock of the existing literature on differentiated integration, but also to rethink the perimeters of disintegration. We argue that phenomena such as Brexit embrace forms of differentiation which trigger the need for conceptualizing differentiated disintegration altogether. This article first sketches the path of the scholarly debate in a chronological way to grasp the breadth of existing literature. Second, it discusses differentiated disintegration as a potentially new area for research. Mapping several scenarios for future research, we propose that differentiated (dis)integration needs to be conceived as a negotiated, but profoundly path-dependent process, which is structurally locked-in, and deeply conditioned by pre-existing organizations and institutions of European integration.",
keywords = "Brexit, differentiated integration, European disintegration, European studies, future of Europe",
author = "Benjamin LERUTH and Stefan Ganzle and Jarle Trondal",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1111/jcms.12869",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "1013--1030",
journal = "Journal of Common Market Studies",
issn = "0021-9886",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union. / LERUTH, Benjamin; Ganzle, Stefan; Trondal, Jarle.

In: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 57, No. 5, 22.05.2019, p. 1013-1030.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union

AU - LERUTH, Benjamin

AU - Ganzle, Stefan

AU - Trondal, Jarle

PY - 2019/5/22

Y1 - 2019/5/22

N2 - In the aftermath of the British referendum to leave the European Union and the European Commission’s ‘White Paper on the Future of Europe’, it is not only time to take stock of the existing literature on differentiated integration, but also to rethink the perimeters of disintegration. We argue that phenomena such as Brexit embrace forms of differentiation which trigger the need for conceptualizing differentiated disintegration altogether. This article first sketches the path of the scholarly debate in a chronological way to grasp the breadth of existing literature. Second, it discusses differentiated disintegration as a potentially new area for research. Mapping several scenarios for future research, we propose that differentiated (dis)integration needs to be conceived as a negotiated, but profoundly path-dependent process, which is structurally locked-in, and deeply conditioned by pre-existing organizations and institutions of European integration.

AB - In the aftermath of the British referendum to leave the European Union and the European Commission’s ‘White Paper on the Future of Europe’, it is not only time to take stock of the existing literature on differentiated integration, but also to rethink the perimeters of disintegration. We argue that phenomena such as Brexit embrace forms of differentiation which trigger the need for conceptualizing differentiated disintegration altogether. This article first sketches the path of the scholarly debate in a chronological way to grasp the breadth of existing literature. Second, it discusses differentiated disintegration as a potentially new area for research. Mapping several scenarios for future research, we propose that differentiated (dis)integration needs to be conceived as a negotiated, but profoundly path-dependent process, which is structurally locked-in, and deeply conditioned by pre-existing organizations and institutions of European integration.

KW - Brexit

KW - differentiated integration

KW - European disintegration

KW - European studies

KW - future of Europe

U2 - 10.1111/jcms.12869

DO - 10.1111/jcms.12869

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 1013

EP - 1030

JO - Journal of Common Market Studies

JF - Journal of Common Market Studies

SN - 0021-9886

IS - 5

ER -