TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring inequities in housing affordability through an analysis of walkability and house prices by neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage
AU - Gunn, Lucy D.
AU - Saghapour, Tayebeh
AU - Giles-Corti, Billie
AU - Turrell, Gavin
N1 - Funding Information:
For this work LDG and TS were supported under the NHMRC funded Centre for Research Excellence in Healthy Liveable Communities (#1061404). LDG is also supported under the NHMRC Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (#9100001); BGC is supported by RMIT under a Vice-Chancellor’s Professorial Fellowship The authors would like to thank the AURIN for providing the Australian Property Monitor data. The assistance of Andy Krause and Gideon Ashwanden in preparing these data for analysis is greatly appreciated. Spatial data have been provided by the Australian Urban Observatory (auo.org.au) and the Healthy Liveable Cities Lab, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University with funding support provided through the NHMRC funded Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, NESP Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub and NHMRC funded Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy, Liveable Communities. We thank Carl Higgs for his role in developing the geospatial data.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the AURIN for providing the Australian Property Monitor data. The assistance of Andy Krause and Gideon Ashwanden in preparing these data for analysis is greatly appreciated. Spatial data have been provided by the Australian Urban Observatory (auo.org.au) and the Healthy Liveable Cities Lab, Centre for Urban Research, RMIT University with funding support provided through the NHMRC funded Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, NESP Clean Air and Urban Landscapes Hub and NHMRC funded Centre of Research Excellence in Healthy, Liveable Communities. We thank Carl Higgs for his role in developing the geospatial data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Cities are socio-spatially patterned, yet few researchers have explored the association between walkability and house prices by neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage, highlighting issues about housing affordability, equity, and liveability. We aimed to determine whether walkability and house prices differed by neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage. To test this, we used linear regression models of house prices stratified by quintiles of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage at the suburb level in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia on walkability and its components (street connectivity, dwelling density, and destination access), and public transit access. Walkability was positively associated with house prices. In the stratified regressions, destination accessibility was associated with higher house prices whilst having poor access to transit was negatively associated with house prices. The association between walkability and house prices was weakest for the most disadvantaged areas, suggesting that houses in these areas were more affordable due, in part, to a lack of amenity. Future planning could redress the relationship between walkability and house prices by making new areas walkable. Increasing densities in outer suburban areas would improve destination and transit access, and in established areas, inclusionary zoning policies could help ensure accessibility to social and affordable housing in amenity-rich areas redressing built environment inequities.
AB - Cities are socio-spatially patterned, yet few researchers have explored the association between walkability and house prices by neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage, highlighting issues about housing affordability, equity, and liveability. We aimed to determine whether walkability and house prices differed by neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage. To test this, we used linear regression models of house prices stratified by quintiles of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage at the suburb level in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia on walkability and its components (street connectivity, dwelling density, and destination access), and public transit access. Walkability was positively associated with house prices. In the stratified regressions, destination accessibility was associated with higher house prices whilst having poor access to transit was negatively associated with house prices. The association between walkability and house prices was weakest for the most disadvantaged areas, suggesting that houses in these areas were more affordable due, in part, to a lack of amenity. Future planning could redress the relationship between walkability and house prices by making new areas walkable. Increasing densities in outer suburban areas would improve destination and transit access, and in established areas, inclusionary zoning policies could help ensure accessibility to social and affordable housing in amenity-rich areas redressing built environment inequities.
KW - hedonic pricing models
KW - Housing affordability
KW - inequities
KW - planning
KW - socioeconomic disadvantage
KW - walkability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131359203&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23748834.2022.2072058
DO - 10.1080/23748834.2022.2072058
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131359203
SN - 2374-8834
VL - 6
SP - 616
EP - 634
JO - Cities and Health
JF - Cities and Health
IS - 3
ER -