TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure to urban greenspace and pathways to respiratory health
T2 - An exploratory systematic review
AU - Mueller, William
AU - Milner, James
AU - Loh, Miranda
AU - Vardoulakis, Sotiris
AU - Wilkinson, Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
Russell Burke and Ken Dixon are thanked for their helpful input into the systematic search strategy. We are grateful for Dr. Paul Whaley's input on the systematic review methods.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/7/10
Y1 - 2022/7/10
N2 - Background/objective: Urban greenspace may have a beneficial or adverse effect on respiratory health. Our objective was to perform an exploratory systematic review to synthesise the evidence and identify the potential causal pathways relating urban greenspace and respiratory health. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines on systematic reviews and searched five databases for eligible studies during 2000–2021. We incorporated a broad range of urban greenspace and respiratory health search terms, including both observational and experimental studies. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias, assessed using the Navigation Guide criteria, were performed independently by two authors. We performed a narrative synthesis and discuss suggested pathways to respiratory health. Results: We identified 108 eligible papers (n = 104 observational, n = 4 experimental). The most common greenspace indicators were the overall greenery or vegetation (also known as greenness), green land use/land cover of physical area classes (e.g., parks, forests), and tree canopy cover. A wide range of respiratory health indicators were studied, with asthma prevalence being the most common. Two thirds (n = 195) of the associations in these studies were positive (i.e., beneficial) with health, with 31% (n = 91) statistically significant; only 9% (n = 25) of reported associations were negative (i.e., adverse) with health and statistically significant. The most consistent positive evidence was apparent for respiratory mortality. There were n = 35 (32%) ‘probably low’ and n = 73 (68%) ‘probably high’ overall ratings of bias. Hypothesised causal pathways for health benefits included lower air pollution, more physically active populations, and exposure to microbial diversity; suggested mechanisms with poorer health included exposure to pollen and other aeroallergens. Conclusion: Many studies showed positive association between urban greenspace and respiratory health, especially lower respiratory mortality; this is suggestive, but not conclusive, of causal effects. Results underscore the importance of contextual factors, greenspace metric employed, and the potential bias of subtle selection factors, which should be explored further.
AB - Background/objective: Urban greenspace may have a beneficial or adverse effect on respiratory health. Our objective was to perform an exploratory systematic review to synthesise the evidence and identify the potential causal pathways relating urban greenspace and respiratory health. Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines on systematic reviews and searched five databases for eligible studies during 2000–2021. We incorporated a broad range of urban greenspace and respiratory health search terms, including both observational and experimental studies. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias, assessed using the Navigation Guide criteria, were performed independently by two authors. We performed a narrative synthesis and discuss suggested pathways to respiratory health. Results: We identified 108 eligible papers (n = 104 observational, n = 4 experimental). The most common greenspace indicators were the overall greenery or vegetation (also known as greenness), green land use/land cover of physical area classes (e.g., parks, forests), and tree canopy cover. A wide range of respiratory health indicators were studied, with asthma prevalence being the most common. Two thirds (n = 195) of the associations in these studies were positive (i.e., beneficial) with health, with 31% (n = 91) statistically significant; only 9% (n = 25) of reported associations were negative (i.e., adverse) with health and statistically significant. The most consistent positive evidence was apparent for respiratory mortality. There were n = 35 (32%) ‘probably low’ and n = 73 (68%) ‘probably high’ overall ratings of bias. Hypothesised causal pathways for health benefits included lower air pollution, more physically active populations, and exposure to microbial diversity; suggested mechanisms with poorer health included exposure to pollen and other aeroallergens. Conclusion: Many studies showed positive association between urban greenspace and respiratory health, especially lower respiratory mortality; this is suggestive, but not conclusive, of causal effects. Results underscore the importance of contextual factors, greenspace metric employed, and the potential bias of subtle selection factors, which should be explored further.
KW - Asthma
KW - Built environment
KW - Greenness
KW - Respiratory mortality
KW - Vegetation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126594843&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154447
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154447
M3 - Article
C2 - 35283125
AN - SCOPUS:85126594843
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 829
SP - 1
EP - 32
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 154447
ER -