TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure to workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Newman, Claire
AU - Roche, Michael
AU - Elliott, Doug
N1 - Funding Information:
No external funding was received for the scoping review. Sources of funding for the included sources of evidence were: DForZo (de Looff et al. 2018); Annual Nurse Strategy Fund, NSW Nursing & Midwifery Office (Newman et al. 2019); Research Committee of St. Andrew's Hospital (Sequeira and Halstead, 2004); and University of Johannesburg (Tema et al. 2011).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: Forensic mental health is a challenging workplace, with nurses subject to various trauma exposures in their professional role. Objectives: To identify the key concepts related to the nature, extent and impact of workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses. Design: A scoping review, informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Methods: Sources of evidence were identified and assessed for inclusion using an explicit search strategy. Relevant information was extracted and synthesised to present a descriptive summary of existing evidence. Results: Of the 16 articles on workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses included in the review, nine reported data related to extent (incidence and severity) and 14 described the impact. The incidence (per bed/per year) of each workplace trauma type ranged from 0.95 – 7.15 for physical violence, 0.39–5.12 for verbal abuse, 0.03–0.12 for sexual violence, and 1.47–7.9 for self-harming behaviour. The proportion of incidents at the lowest severity rating ranged from 15.1% to 84.7%, and the range for the highest severity rating was 0% to 38.7%. In the single study that examined the incidence of vicarious trauma, 14.9% reported low levels and 27.7% reported high levels. Psychological distress was the most commonly reported impact of workplace trauma, identified in eight studies. Seven studies reported limited data for physical injury from workplace trauma. The impacts of exposure to workplace trauma reported in the remaining studies included needing to access psychological support, experiencing physiological symptoms, feeling less safe at work, and requiring time off work. With the exception of two studies providing limited data related to absenteeism, the impact for organisations was not explored in existing literature. Conclusions: While studies indicated that forensic mental health nurses are frequently exposed to various forms of workplace trauma, reports of severe assaults on staff were rare. Although limited, these findings suggest that cumulative exposure to workplace trauma over time, or exposure to more severe forms of physical violence, increase forensic mental health nurse vulnerability to experiencing detrimental impacts on their personal and professional wellbeing.
AB - Background: Forensic mental health is a challenging workplace, with nurses subject to various trauma exposures in their professional role. Objectives: To identify the key concepts related to the nature, extent and impact of workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses. Design: A scoping review, informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Methods: Sources of evidence were identified and assessed for inclusion using an explicit search strategy. Relevant information was extracted and synthesised to present a descriptive summary of existing evidence. Results: Of the 16 articles on workplace trauma for forensic mental health nurses included in the review, nine reported data related to extent (incidence and severity) and 14 described the impact. The incidence (per bed/per year) of each workplace trauma type ranged from 0.95 – 7.15 for physical violence, 0.39–5.12 for verbal abuse, 0.03–0.12 for sexual violence, and 1.47–7.9 for self-harming behaviour. The proportion of incidents at the lowest severity rating ranged from 15.1% to 84.7%, and the range for the highest severity rating was 0% to 38.7%. In the single study that examined the incidence of vicarious trauma, 14.9% reported low levels and 27.7% reported high levels. Psychological distress was the most commonly reported impact of workplace trauma, identified in eight studies. Seven studies reported limited data for physical injury from workplace trauma. The impacts of exposure to workplace trauma reported in the remaining studies included needing to access psychological support, experiencing physiological symptoms, feeling less safe at work, and requiring time off work. With the exception of two studies providing limited data related to absenteeism, the impact for organisations was not explored in existing literature. Conclusions: While studies indicated that forensic mental health nurses are frequently exposed to various forms of workplace trauma, reports of severe assaults on staff were rare. Although limited, these findings suggest that cumulative exposure to workplace trauma over time, or exposure to more severe forms of physical violence, increase forensic mental health nurse vulnerability to experiencing detrimental impacts on their personal and professional wellbeing.
KW - Aggression
KW - Exposure to violence
KW - Forensic nursing
KW - Mental health services
KW - Restraint, physical
KW - Self-injurious behavior
KW - Workplace violence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101564717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103897
DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103897
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33647844
AN - SCOPUS:85101564717
SN - 0020-7489
VL - 117
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies
JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies
M1 - 103897
ER -