Abstract
Democratic innovations face the challenge of realizing deliberative democratic ideals in the context of structural inequality. Consensus decision making and expertise have been said to have exclusive effects on marginalized groups like women and ethnic and sexual minorities, which obstructs diversity. Wisdom Councils as practiced in Austria attempt to counter inequalities by including marginalized groups through the moderation technique dynamic facilitation. Exploratory participatory observations and interviews with a moderator and the participants of two Wisdom Councils in Austria provide a deeper understanding of the inclusive processes at work in Wisdom Councils facilitating a productive combination of consensus and diversity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 7 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1–11 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Journal of Public Deliberation |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |