False-performance feedback does not affect punching forces and pacing of elite boxers

Israel Halperin, Dale W. Chapman, Kevin G. Thompson, Chris Abbiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Prior research indicates that providing participants with positive augmented feedback tends to enhance motor learning and performance, whereas the opposite occurs with negative feedback. However, the majority of studies were conducted with untrained participants performing unfamiliar motor tasks and so it remains unclear if elite athletes completing familiar tasks respond in a similar fashion. Thus, this study investigated the effects of three different versions of false-performance feedback on punching force (N), pacing (force over time) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in 15 elite amateur male boxers. Athletes completed a simulated boxing bout consisting of three rounds with 84 maximal effort punches delivered to a punching integrator on four separate days. Day one was a familiarisation session in which no feedback was provided. In the following three days athletes randomly received false-positive, false-negative and false-neutral feedback on their punching performance between each round. No statistical or meaningful differences were observed in punching forces, pacing or RPE between conditions (P > 0.05; ≤ 2%). These null results could stem from the elite status of the athletes involved, the focus on performance rather than learning, or they may indicate that false feedback has a less potent effect on performance than previously thought.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-66
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Athletes
Boxing
Learning
Research

Cite this

Halperin, Israel ; Chapman, Dale W. ; Thompson, Kevin G. ; Abbiss, Chris. / False-performance feedback does not affect punching forces and pacing of elite boxers. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 59-66.
@article{ed389c82fb4d49d9a9b721b425875297,
title = "False-performance feedback does not affect punching forces and pacing of elite boxers",
abstract = "Prior research indicates that providing participants with positive augmented feedback tends to enhance motor learning and performance, whereas the opposite occurs with negative feedback. However, the majority of studies were conducted with untrained participants performing unfamiliar motor tasks and so it remains unclear if elite athletes completing familiar tasks respond in a similar fashion. Thus, this study investigated the effects of three different versions of false-performance feedback on punching force (N), pacing (force over time) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in 15 elite amateur male boxers. Athletes completed a simulated boxing bout consisting of three rounds with 84 maximal effort punches delivered to a punching integrator on four separate days. Day one was a familiarisation session in which no feedback was provided. In the following three days athletes randomly received false-positive, false-negative and false-neutral feedback on their punching performance between each round. No statistical or meaningful differences were observed in punching forces, pacing or RPE between conditions (P > 0.05; ≤ 2{\%}). These null results could stem from the elite status of the athletes involved, the focus on performance rather than learning, or they may indicate that false feedback has a less potent effect on performance than previously thought.",
keywords = "boxing, coaching cues, combat sport, punching forces, Verbal instructions",
author = "Israel Halperin and Chapman, {Dale W.} and Thompson, {Kevin G.} and Chris Abbiss",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2018.1482526",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "59--66",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

False-performance feedback does not affect punching forces and pacing of elite boxers. / Halperin, Israel; Chapman, Dale W.; Thompson, Kevin G.; Abbiss, Chris.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2019, p. 59-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - False-performance feedback does not affect punching forces and pacing of elite boxers

AU - Halperin, Israel

AU - Chapman, Dale W.

AU - Thompson, Kevin G.

AU - Abbiss, Chris

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Prior research indicates that providing participants with positive augmented feedback tends to enhance motor learning and performance, whereas the opposite occurs with negative feedback. However, the majority of studies were conducted with untrained participants performing unfamiliar motor tasks and so it remains unclear if elite athletes completing familiar tasks respond in a similar fashion. Thus, this study investigated the effects of three different versions of false-performance feedback on punching force (N), pacing (force over time) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in 15 elite amateur male boxers. Athletes completed a simulated boxing bout consisting of three rounds with 84 maximal effort punches delivered to a punching integrator on four separate days. Day one was a familiarisation session in which no feedback was provided. In the following three days athletes randomly received false-positive, false-negative and false-neutral feedback on their punching performance between each round. No statistical or meaningful differences were observed in punching forces, pacing or RPE between conditions (P > 0.05; ≤ 2%). These null results could stem from the elite status of the athletes involved, the focus on performance rather than learning, or they may indicate that false feedback has a less potent effect on performance than previously thought.

AB - Prior research indicates that providing participants with positive augmented feedback tends to enhance motor learning and performance, whereas the opposite occurs with negative feedback. However, the majority of studies were conducted with untrained participants performing unfamiliar motor tasks and so it remains unclear if elite athletes completing familiar tasks respond in a similar fashion. Thus, this study investigated the effects of three different versions of false-performance feedback on punching force (N), pacing (force over time) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in 15 elite amateur male boxers. Athletes completed a simulated boxing bout consisting of three rounds with 84 maximal effort punches delivered to a punching integrator on four separate days. Day one was a familiarisation session in which no feedback was provided. In the following three days athletes randomly received false-positive, false-negative and false-neutral feedback on their punching performance between each round. No statistical or meaningful differences were observed in punching forces, pacing or RPE between conditions (P > 0.05; ≤ 2%). These null results could stem from the elite status of the athletes involved, the focus on performance rather than learning, or they may indicate that false feedback has a less potent effect on performance than previously thought.

KW - boxing

KW - coaching cues

KW - combat sport

KW - punching forces

KW - Verbal instructions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047982820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1482526

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2018.1482526

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 59

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Sports Science

JF - Journal of Sports Science

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 1

ER -