Farmer health and adaptive capacity in the face of climate change and variability. Part 2: Contexts, personal attributes and behaviors

Anthony Hogan, Adam Bode, Helen Berry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This study extends the emerging body of research on farmer adaptation to climate change, by segmenting farmers on the basis of specific attributes (health, values, belief about climate change, sense of responsibility for climate change, desire to change, social, human and financial capitals and farmer demographics) and considering such attributes as critical social aspects of the contextualized capacity to adapt. The segmental analysis was based on a nationally representative sample of 3,993 farmers concerned with farmer adaptation of climate risks. The resulting data were subjected to two-step cluster analysis to identify homogenous groups of farmers based on factors related to climate change adaptation. A three-cluster solution was identified wherein farmers were distinguishable on the basis of belief in climate change, desire for financial assistance and advice, social connectedness, information seeking, and adverse farm conditions. The largest group (Cluster 1: 55%) was characterized by farmers who recognized being affected by drought and drying and who were actively engaged in adaptive practices, despite the fact that they had little income and poor farm resources. One third of these farmers reported that their health was a barrier to sustained activity in farming. Cluster 2 (26%) was characterized by farmers not readily affected by drying, who enjoyed good incomes, good health and better farming conditions. They expressed little desire to adapt. The smallest cluster (Cluster 3: 19%) was also characterized by farmers who recognized that they were affected by drying. However, despite a desire to adapt, they had very little means to do so. They reported the poorest natural resources and the poorest health, despite being younger. The findings suggest that it is the intent to adapt, starting from where people are at, which is a more important indicator of the capacity to work towards sustainable practices than assets tests alone. View Full-Text
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4055-4068
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    Volume8
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Climate Change
    Health
    Agriculture
    Farmers
    Droughts
    Climate
    Cluster Analysis
    Economics
    Demography

    Cite this

    @article{d2cee44f447e4b79af8955545f604a51,
    title = "Farmer health and adaptive capacity in the face of climate change and variability. Part 2: Contexts, personal attributes and behaviors",
    abstract = "This study extends the emerging body of research on farmer adaptation to climate change, by segmenting farmers on the basis of specific attributes (health, values, belief about climate change, sense of responsibility for climate change, desire to change, social, human and financial capitals and farmer demographics) and considering such attributes as critical social aspects of the contextualized capacity to adapt. The segmental analysis was based on a nationally representative sample of 3,993 farmers concerned with farmer adaptation of climate risks. The resulting data were subjected to two-step cluster analysis to identify homogenous groups of farmers based on factors related to climate change adaptation. A three-cluster solution was identified wherein farmers were distinguishable on the basis of belief in climate change, desire for financial assistance and advice, social connectedness, information seeking, and adverse farm conditions. The largest group (Cluster 1: 55{\%}) was characterized by farmers who recognized being affected by drought and drying and who were actively engaged in adaptive practices, despite the fact that they had little income and poor farm resources. One third of these farmers reported that their health was a barrier to sustained activity in farming. Cluster 2 (26{\%}) was characterized by farmers not readily affected by drying, who enjoyed good incomes, good health and better farming conditions. They expressed little desire to adapt. The smallest cluster (Cluster 3: 19{\%}) was also characterized by farmers who recognized that they were affected by drying. However, despite a desire to adapt, they had very little means to do so. They reported the poorest natural resources and the poorest health, despite being younger. The findings suggest that it is the intent to adapt, starting from where people are at, which is a more important indicator of the capacity to work towards sustainable practices than assets tests alone. View Full-Text",
    keywords = "Adaptation, Climate change, Farmers, Health, Social profiles",
    author = "Anthony Hogan and Adam Bode and Helen Berry",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.3390/ijerph8104055",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "4055--4068",
    journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
    issn = "1660-4601",
    publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
    number = "10",

    }

    Farmer health and adaptive capacity in the face of climate change and variability. Part 2: Contexts, personal attributes and behaviors. / Hogan, Anthony; Bode, Adam; Berry, Helen.

    In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 8, No. 10, 2011, p. 4055-4068.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Farmer health and adaptive capacity in the face of climate change and variability. Part 2: Contexts, personal attributes and behaviors

    AU - Hogan, Anthony

    AU - Bode, Adam

    AU - Berry, Helen

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - This study extends the emerging body of research on farmer adaptation to climate change, by segmenting farmers on the basis of specific attributes (health, values, belief about climate change, sense of responsibility for climate change, desire to change, social, human and financial capitals and farmer demographics) and considering such attributes as critical social aspects of the contextualized capacity to adapt. The segmental analysis was based on a nationally representative sample of 3,993 farmers concerned with farmer adaptation of climate risks. The resulting data were subjected to two-step cluster analysis to identify homogenous groups of farmers based on factors related to climate change adaptation. A three-cluster solution was identified wherein farmers were distinguishable on the basis of belief in climate change, desire for financial assistance and advice, social connectedness, information seeking, and adverse farm conditions. The largest group (Cluster 1: 55%) was characterized by farmers who recognized being affected by drought and drying and who were actively engaged in adaptive practices, despite the fact that they had little income and poor farm resources. One third of these farmers reported that their health was a barrier to sustained activity in farming. Cluster 2 (26%) was characterized by farmers not readily affected by drying, who enjoyed good incomes, good health and better farming conditions. They expressed little desire to adapt. The smallest cluster (Cluster 3: 19%) was also characterized by farmers who recognized that they were affected by drying. However, despite a desire to adapt, they had very little means to do so. They reported the poorest natural resources and the poorest health, despite being younger. The findings suggest that it is the intent to adapt, starting from where people are at, which is a more important indicator of the capacity to work towards sustainable practices than assets tests alone. View Full-Text

    AB - This study extends the emerging body of research on farmer adaptation to climate change, by segmenting farmers on the basis of specific attributes (health, values, belief about climate change, sense of responsibility for climate change, desire to change, social, human and financial capitals and farmer demographics) and considering such attributes as critical social aspects of the contextualized capacity to adapt. The segmental analysis was based on a nationally representative sample of 3,993 farmers concerned with farmer adaptation of climate risks. The resulting data were subjected to two-step cluster analysis to identify homogenous groups of farmers based on factors related to climate change adaptation. A three-cluster solution was identified wherein farmers were distinguishable on the basis of belief in climate change, desire for financial assistance and advice, social connectedness, information seeking, and adverse farm conditions. The largest group (Cluster 1: 55%) was characterized by farmers who recognized being affected by drought and drying and who were actively engaged in adaptive practices, despite the fact that they had little income and poor farm resources. One third of these farmers reported that their health was a barrier to sustained activity in farming. Cluster 2 (26%) was characterized by farmers not readily affected by drying, who enjoyed good incomes, good health and better farming conditions. They expressed little desire to adapt. The smallest cluster (Cluster 3: 19%) was also characterized by farmers who recognized that they were affected by drying. However, despite a desire to adapt, they had very little means to do so. They reported the poorest natural resources and the poorest health, despite being younger. The findings suggest that it is the intent to adapt, starting from where people are at, which is a more important indicator of the capacity to work towards sustainable practices than assets tests alone. View Full-Text

    KW - Adaptation

    KW - Climate change

    KW - Farmers

    KW - Health

    KW - Social profiles

    U2 - 10.3390/ijerph8104055

    DO - 10.3390/ijerph8104055

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 4055

    EP - 4068

    JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

    SN - 1660-4601

    IS - 10

    ER -