Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics

Gerry STOKER, Colin Hay, Matthew Barr

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    A major programme of research on cognition has been built around the idea that human beings are frequently intuitive thinkers and that human intuition is imperfect. The modern marketing of politics and the time-poor position of many citizens suggests that ‘fast’,intuitive,thinking in many contemporary democracies is ubiquitous. This article explores the consequences that such fast thinking might have for the democratic practice of contemporary politics. Using focus groups with a range of demographic pro?les, fast thinking about how politics works is stimulated and followed by a more re?ective and collectively deliberative form of slow thinking among the same participants. A strong trajectory emerges consistently in all groups in that in fast thinking mode participants are noticeably more negative and dismissive about the workings of politics than when in slow thinking mode. A fast thinking focus among citizens may be good enough to underwrite mainstream political exchange, but at the cost of supporting a general negativity about politics and the way it works. Yet breaking the cycle of fast thinking – as advocated by deliberation theorists – might not be straightforward because of the grip of fast thinking. The fast/slow thinking distinction, if carefully used,offers valuable new insight into political science
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3-21
    Number of pages19
    JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
    Volume55
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    politics
    citizen
    intuition
    deliberation
    political science
    cognition
    marketing
    Group
    human being

    Cite this

    STOKER, Gerry ; Hay, Colin ; Barr, Matthew. / Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics. In: European Journal of Political Research. 2016 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 3-21.
    @article{b8b5e3fec6a746d581130083c96f3e65,
    title = "Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics",
    abstract = "A major programme of research on cognition has been built around the idea that human beings are frequently intuitive thinkers and that human intuition is imperfect. The modern marketing of politics and the time-poor position of many citizens suggests that ‘fast’,intuitive,thinking in many contemporary democracies is ubiquitous. This article explores the consequences that such fast thinking might have for the democratic practice of contemporary politics. Using focus groups with a range of demographic pro?les, fast thinking about how politics works is stimulated and followed by a more re?ective and collectively deliberative form of slow thinking among the same participants. A strong trajectory emerges consistently in all groups in that in fast thinking mode participants are noticeably more negative and dismissive about the workings of politics than when in slow thinking mode. A fast thinking focus among citizens may be good enough to underwrite mainstream political exchange, but at the cost of supporting a general negativity about politics and the way it works. Yet breaking the cycle of fast thinking – as advocated by deliberation theorists – might not be straightforward because of the grip of fast thinking. The fast/slow thinking distinction, if carefully used,offers valuable new insight into political science",
    keywords = "Democracy, cognitive science, deliberation, anti-politics",
    author = "Gerry STOKER and Colin Hay and Matthew Barr",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.12113",
    language = "English",
    volume = "55",
    pages = "3--21",
    journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
    issn = "0304-4130",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics. / STOKER, Gerry; Hay, Colin; Barr, Matthew.

    In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2016, p. 3-21.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Fast Thinking: Implications for Democratic Politics

    AU - STOKER, Gerry

    AU - Hay, Colin

    AU - Barr, Matthew

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - A major programme of research on cognition has been built around the idea that human beings are frequently intuitive thinkers and that human intuition is imperfect. The modern marketing of politics and the time-poor position of many citizens suggests that ‘fast’,intuitive,thinking in many contemporary democracies is ubiquitous. This article explores the consequences that such fast thinking might have for the democratic practice of contemporary politics. Using focus groups with a range of demographic pro?les, fast thinking about how politics works is stimulated and followed by a more re?ective and collectively deliberative form of slow thinking among the same participants. A strong trajectory emerges consistently in all groups in that in fast thinking mode participants are noticeably more negative and dismissive about the workings of politics than when in slow thinking mode. A fast thinking focus among citizens may be good enough to underwrite mainstream political exchange, but at the cost of supporting a general negativity about politics and the way it works. Yet breaking the cycle of fast thinking – as advocated by deliberation theorists – might not be straightforward because of the grip of fast thinking. The fast/slow thinking distinction, if carefully used,offers valuable new insight into political science

    AB - A major programme of research on cognition has been built around the idea that human beings are frequently intuitive thinkers and that human intuition is imperfect. The modern marketing of politics and the time-poor position of many citizens suggests that ‘fast’,intuitive,thinking in many contemporary democracies is ubiquitous. This article explores the consequences that such fast thinking might have for the democratic practice of contemporary politics. Using focus groups with a range of demographic pro?les, fast thinking about how politics works is stimulated and followed by a more re?ective and collectively deliberative form of slow thinking among the same participants. A strong trajectory emerges consistently in all groups in that in fast thinking mode participants are noticeably more negative and dismissive about the workings of politics than when in slow thinking mode. A fast thinking focus among citizens may be good enough to underwrite mainstream political exchange, but at the cost of supporting a general negativity about politics and the way it works. Yet breaking the cycle of fast thinking – as advocated by deliberation theorists – might not be straightforward because of the grip of fast thinking. The fast/slow thinking distinction, if carefully used,offers valuable new insight into political science

    KW - Democracy

    KW - cognitive science

    KW - deliberation

    KW - anti-politics

    U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.12113

    DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.12113

    M3 - Article

    VL - 55

    SP - 3

    EP - 21

    JO - European Journal of Political Research

    JF - European Journal of Political Research

    SN - 0304-4130

    IS - 1

    ER -