Fathers’ Allegations of Mental Health and Mothers’ Allegations of Coercive Control: Intersections and Outcomes in Family Law Proceedings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the possible impact of separated fathers’ coercive control on their former partners’ mental health, and the apparent differential treatment of mothers’ and fathers’ allegations by family law courts. A small select population of judgments for the period 2013–20 published in the Australasian Legal Information Institute were identified. Each matter contained allegations of both maternal mental health issues and allegations of family violence against the father. The analysis of this sample has shown that the psychological impact of coercive control on mothers tends to be minimised. The courts do appear to acknowledge the potential nexus between controlling behaviour and mental health but give primacy to the impact of coercive control on the mother’s parenting capacity rather than on her mental health. This approach can adversely impact mothers because it can result in a child being placed in a violent father’s care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-90
Number of pages34
JournalAustralian Journal of Family Law
Volume34
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fathers’ Allegations of Mental Health and Mothers’ Allegations of Coercive Control: Intersections and Outcomes in Family Law Proceedings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this