Feminist Jurisprudence, the Australian Legal System and Intimate Partner Sexual Violence

Fiction Over Fact

Jessica white, Patricia EASTEAL

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we briefly focus on intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) and the Australian legal response, using recent Court judgements and Heather Wishik’s feminist jurisprudence framework for inquiry to guide investigation. The key questions being asked are: (1) What have been and what are now all women’s experiences of IPSV addressed by the substance and process of rape law? (2) What assumptions, descriptions, assertions and/or definitions of consent, corroboration and reporting does the law make in IPSV matters? (3) What is the area of mismatch, distortion or denial created by the differences between women’s life experiences of IPSV coercion and the law’s assumptions or imposed structures? (4) What patriarchal interests are served by the mismatch? The paper concludes with consideration of the limitations and benefits of law reform by reflecting on the findings of the paper.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)11-28
Number of pages18
JournalLaws
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

legal system
jurisprudence
sexual violence
mismatch
Law
judgment or sentence
law reform
rape
experience

Cite this

white, Jessica ; EASTEAL, Patricia. / Feminist Jurisprudence, the Australian Legal System and Intimate Partner Sexual Violence : Fiction Over Fact. In: Laws. 2016 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 11-28.
@article{c71c6c7d73eb4b0a9c5307581996fd3b,
title = "Feminist Jurisprudence, the Australian Legal System and Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: Fiction Over Fact",
abstract = "In this paper we briefly focus on intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) and the Australian legal response, using recent Court judgements and Heather Wishik’s feminist jurisprudence framework for inquiry to guide investigation. The key questions being asked are: (1) What have been and what are now all women’s experiences of IPSV addressed by the substance and process of rape law? (2) What assumptions, descriptions, assertions and/or definitions of consent, corroboration and reporting does the law make in IPSV matters? (3) What is the area of mismatch, distortion or denial created by the differences between women’s life experiences of IPSV coercion and the law’s assumptions or imposed structures? (4) What patriarchal interests are served by the mismatch? The paper concludes with consideration of the limitations and benefits of law reform by reflecting on the findings of the paper.",
keywords = "Partner rape methodology and law, IPSV myths and law",
author = "Jessica white and Patricia EASTEAL",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3390/laws5010011",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "11--28",
journal = "Laws",
issn = "2075-471X",
number = "1",

}

Feminist Jurisprudence, the Australian Legal System and Intimate Partner Sexual Violence : Fiction Over Fact. / white, Jessica; EASTEAL, Patricia.

In: Laws, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, p. 11-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feminist Jurisprudence, the Australian Legal System and Intimate Partner Sexual Violence

T2 - Fiction Over Fact

AU - white, Jessica

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this paper we briefly focus on intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) and the Australian legal response, using recent Court judgements and Heather Wishik’s feminist jurisprudence framework for inquiry to guide investigation. The key questions being asked are: (1) What have been and what are now all women’s experiences of IPSV addressed by the substance and process of rape law? (2) What assumptions, descriptions, assertions and/or definitions of consent, corroboration and reporting does the law make in IPSV matters? (3) What is the area of mismatch, distortion or denial created by the differences between women’s life experiences of IPSV coercion and the law’s assumptions or imposed structures? (4) What patriarchal interests are served by the mismatch? The paper concludes with consideration of the limitations and benefits of law reform by reflecting on the findings of the paper.

AB - In this paper we briefly focus on intimate partner sexual violence (IPSV) and the Australian legal response, using recent Court judgements and Heather Wishik’s feminist jurisprudence framework for inquiry to guide investigation. The key questions being asked are: (1) What have been and what are now all women’s experiences of IPSV addressed by the substance and process of rape law? (2) What assumptions, descriptions, assertions and/or definitions of consent, corroboration and reporting does the law make in IPSV matters? (3) What is the area of mismatch, distortion or denial created by the differences between women’s life experiences of IPSV coercion and the law’s assumptions or imposed structures? (4) What patriarchal interests are served by the mismatch? The paper concludes with consideration of the limitations and benefits of law reform by reflecting on the findings of the paper.

KW - Partner rape methodology and law

KW - IPSV myths and law

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/feminist-jurisprudence-australian-legal-system-intimate-partner-sexual-violence-fiction-fact

U2 - 10.3390/laws5010011

DO - 10.3390/laws5010011

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 11

EP - 28

JO - Laws

JF - Laws

SN - 2075-471X

IS - 1

ER -