Fingerprint identification

How far have we come

Chris LENNARD

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fingerprint identification has been an accepted forensic discipline for more than 110 years. But how far have we come with respect to the interpretation and reporting of fingerprint evidence? Should the discipline follow the DNA lead and introduce mathematical models for the assessment of fingerprint evidence, with the statistic' - the number generated by the model - then becoming the evidence presented in court? Further to this, and with respect to evidence that can be given a statistical value, to what extent are we meeting our professional obligation to ensure that the weight of the evidence we present in court is fully understood and not misinterpreted?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-367
Number of pages12
JournalAustralian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Dermatoglyphics
Theoretical Models
Weights and Measures
DNA

Cite this

LENNARD, Chris. / Fingerprint identification : How far have we come. In: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 356-367.
@article{cdf89ce9229c453894e8c678af8356c7,
title = "Fingerprint identification: How far have we come",
abstract = "Fingerprint identification has been an accepted forensic discipline for more than 110 years. But how far have we come with respect to the interpretation and reporting of fingerprint evidence? Should the discipline follow the DNA lead and introduce mathematical models for the assessment of fingerprint evidence, with the statistic' - the number generated by the model - then becoming the evidence presented in court? Further to this, and with respect to evidence that can be given a statistical value, to what extent are we meeting our professional obligation to ensure that the weight of the evidence we present in court is fully understood and not misinterpreted?",
keywords = "Bayesian interpretation, DNA profiling, evidence presentation, fingerprint identification, likelihood ratios, mathematical models",
author = "Chris LENNARD",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/00450618.2012.752037",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "356--367",
journal = "Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences",
issn = "0045-0618",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Fingerprint identification : How far have we come. / LENNARD, Chris.

In: Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2013, p. 356-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fingerprint identification

T2 - How far have we come

AU - LENNARD, Chris

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Fingerprint identification has been an accepted forensic discipline for more than 110 years. But how far have we come with respect to the interpretation and reporting of fingerprint evidence? Should the discipline follow the DNA lead and introduce mathematical models for the assessment of fingerprint evidence, with the statistic' - the number generated by the model - then becoming the evidence presented in court? Further to this, and with respect to evidence that can be given a statistical value, to what extent are we meeting our professional obligation to ensure that the weight of the evidence we present in court is fully understood and not misinterpreted?

AB - Fingerprint identification has been an accepted forensic discipline for more than 110 years. But how far have we come with respect to the interpretation and reporting of fingerprint evidence? Should the discipline follow the DNA lead and introduce mathematical models for the assessment of fingerprint evidence, with the statistic' - the number generated by the model - then becoming the evidence presented in court? Further to this, and with respect to evidence that can be given a statistical value, to what extent are we meeting our professional obligation to ensure that the weight of the evidence we present in court is fully understood and not misinterpreted?

KW - Bayesian interpretation

KW - DNA profiling

KW - evidence presentation

KW - fingerprint identification

KW - likelihood ratios

KW - mathematical models

U2 - 10.1080/00450618.2012.752037

DO - 10.1080/00450618.2012.752037

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 356

EP - 367

JO - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

JF - Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

SN - 0045-0618

IS - 4

ER -