Flexible Work Practices and Private Law Firm Culture: A Complex Quagmire for Australian Women Laywers

Patricia EASTEAL, ANNE CALIGARI, Lorana BARTELS, Emma Fitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this article, we examine gender and the work culture in Australian private law firms. Our primary focus is the extent to which flexible work practices remain a quagmire for female lawyers. We consider the systemic barriers affecting women lawyers, including hidden attitudes, the persistence of a gendered division of labour in the private sphere, the ongoing gender pay gap in Australia, and the ways in which the law firm ethos of long working hours disadvantages women. We then present some practical steps to remedy this situation, including accommodating working mothers’ time constraints, mentoring and networking, and training for managers and support staff. It is proposed that more needs to be done to encourage employers to implement these methods with confidence that flexible work arrangements can provide benefit to the firm as a whole, as well as individual employees. To achieve this, we put forward a reform of the framework in order to implement these practical steps. We also discuss some ways to possibly effect attitudinal change in law firm culture and conclude with some observations about the future of legal practice in this context. Finally, further involvement of the Law Council of Australia is proposed, to impose conditions on the practising certificates of lawyers in supervisory roles to assist them in complying with the framework. This would also ensure that flexible work arrangements are accessible to both employers and employees, which in turn will assist in dissolving the systematic discrimination that female lawyers face in private law firms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-50
Number of pages21
JournalQUT Law Review
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

private law
lawyer
firm
Law
employer
employee
work culture
legal usage
working hours
gender
division of labor
mentoring
remedies
certification
persistence
networking
discrimination
confidence
manager
staff

Cite this

EASTEAL, Patricia ; CALIGARI, ANNE ; BARTELS, Lorana ; Fitch, Emma. / Flexible Work Practices and Private Law Firm Culture: A Complex Quagmire for Australian Women Laywers. In: QUT Law Review. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 30-50.
@article{0545fc354e79453688d442a0488fd92f,
title = "Flexible Work Practices and Private Law Firm Culture: A Complex Quagmire for Australian Women Laywers",
abstract = "In this article, we examine gender and the work culture in Australian private law firms. Our primary focus is the extent to which flexible work practices remain a quagmire for female lawyers. We consider the systemic barriers affecting women lawyers, including hidden attitudes, the persistence of a gendered division of labour in the private sphere, the ongoing gender pay gap in Australia, and the ways in which the law firm ethos of long working hours disadvantages women. We then present some practical steps to remedy this situation, including accommodating working mothers’ time constraints, mentoring and networking, and training for managers and support staff. It is proposed that more needs to be done to encourage employers to implement these methods with confidence that flexible work arrangements can provide benefit to the firm as a whole, as well as individual employees. To achieve this, we put forward a reform of the framework in order to implement these practical steps. We also discuss some ways to possibly effect attitudinal change in law firm culture and conclude with some observations about the future of legal practice in this context. Finally, further involvement of the Law Council of Australia is proposed, to impose conditions on the practising certificates of lawyers in supervisory roles to assist them in complying with the framework. This would also ensure that flexible work arrangements are accessible to both employers and employees, which in turn will assist in dissolving the systematic discrimination that female lawyers face in private law firms.",
author = "Patricia EASTEAL and ANNE CALIGARI and Lorana BARTELS and Emma Fitch",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.5204/qutlr.v15i1.574",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "30--50",
journal = "QUT Law Review",
issn = "2201-7275",
number = "1",

}

Flexible Work Practices and Private Law Firm Culture: A Complex Quagmire for Australian Women Laywers. / EASTEAL, Patricia; CALIGARI, ANNE; BARTELS, Lorana; Fitch, Emma.

In: QUT Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2015, p. 30-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexible Work Practices and Private Law Firm Culture: A Complex Quagmire for Australian Women Laywers

AU - EASTEAL, Patricia

AU - CALIGARI, ANNE

AU - BARTELS, Lorana

AU - Fitch, Emma

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this article, we examine gender and the work culture in Australian private law firms. Our primary focus is the extent to which flexible work practices remain a quagmire for female lawyers. We consider the systemic barriers affecting women lawyers, including hidden attitudes, the persistence of a gendered division of labour in the private sphere, the ongoing gender pay gap in Australia, and the ways in which the law firm ethos of long working hours disadvantages women. We then present some practical steps to remedy this situation, including accommodating working mothers’ time constraints, mentoring and networking, and training for managers and support staff. It is proposed that more needs to be done to encourage employers to implement these methods with confidence that flexible work arrangements can provide benefit to the firm as a whole, as well as individual employees. To achieve this, we put forward a reform of the framework in order to implement these practical steps. We also discuss some ways to possibly effect attitudinal change in law firm culture and conclude with some observations about the future of legal practice in this context. Finally, further involvement of the Law Council of Australia is proposed, to impose conditions on the practising certificates of lawyers in supervisory roles to assist them in complying with the framework. This would also ensure that flexible work arrangements are accessible to both employers and employees, which in turn will assist in dissolving the systematic discrimination that female lawyers face in private law firms.

AB - In this article, we examine gender and the work culture in Australian private law firms. Our primary focus is the extent to which flexible work practices remain a quagmire for female lawyers. We consider the systemic barriers affecting women lawyers, including hidden attitudes, the persistence of a gendered division of labour in the private sphere, the ongoing gender pay gap in Australia, and the ways in which the law firm ethos of long working hours disadvantages women. We then present some practical steps to remedy this situation, including accommodating working mothers’ time constraints, mentoring and networking, and training for managers and support staff. It is proposed that more needs to be done to encourage employers to implement these methods with confidence that flexible work arrangements can provide benefit to the firm as a whole, as well as individual employees. To achieve this, we put forward a reform of the framework in order to implement these practical steps. We also discuss some ways to possibly effect attitudinal change in law firm culture and conclude with some observations about the future of legal practice in this context. Finally, further involvement of the Law Council of Australia is proposed, to impose conditions on the practising certificates of lawyers in supervisory roles to assist them in complying with the framework. This would also ensure that flexible work arrangements are accessible to both employers and employees, which in turn will assist in dissolving the systematic discrimination that female lawyers face in private law firms.

U2 - 10.5204/qutlr.v15i1.574

DO - 10.5204/qutlr.v15i1.574

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 30

EP - 50

JO - QUT Law Review

JF - QUT Law Review

SN - 2201-7275

IS - 1

ER -