Food of the Future? Consumer Responses to the Idea of 3D-Printed Meat and Insect-Based Foods

Deborah LUPTON, Bethaney TURNER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

3D printing technologies are beginning to be employed to fabricate new food products. One of the more unusual and potentially controversial adoptions of this novel food technology involves the use of laboratory-cultured meat or insect-based ingredients to support ethical consumption, food security, and environmental sustainability initiatives. In this article, we discuss findings from our study involving an online discussion group with Australian participants concerning their attitudes to a novel technology that combined new food processing and presentation devices (the 3D printer) with a range of ingredients. The participants recognized the potential benefits of insect- and cultured-meat-based printed food for society. However, their own priorities for food consumption choices centered more on the qualities of health, taste, and naturalness. We found that overall, few participants articulated interest in or support for consuming or serving 3D-printed food products made from cultured meat or insects. Most expressed their disquiet about the degree of processing cultured meat undergoes. It was considered to be “unnatural,” and therefore not fresh, potentially harmful, lacking taste or not nutritious. Most of the participants also expressed antipathy towards the idea of eating printed products containing insects. While such products were considered more “natural” and nutritious than cultured meat, the idea of eating insects was predominantly greeted with disgust. As these findings suggest, plans to use 3D printing technologies to render ingredients such as cultured meat and insects more acceptable and appealing to consumers in countries like Australia have major cultural barriers to overcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-289
Number of pages20
JournalFood and Foodways
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Meat
Insects
meat
food
printing technology
Food
insects
food consumption
eating behavior
ingredients
Technology
electronic discussion groups
foods
social barriers
Eating
ingestion
printers
printer
novel foods
Food Handling

Cite this

@article{d94d76c553c2416d93f94f7de009e573,
title = "Food of the Future? Consumer Responses to the Idea of 3D-Printed Meat and Insect-Based Foods",
abstract = "3D printing technologies are beginning to be employed to fabricate new food products. One of the more unusual and potentially controversial adoptions of this novel food technology involves the use of laboratory-cultured meat or insect-based ingredients to support ethical consumption, food security, and environmental sustainability initiatives. In this article, we discuss findings from our study involving an online discussion group with Australian participants concerning their attitudes to a novel technology that combined new food processing and presentation devices (the 3D printer) with a range of ingredients. The participants recognized the potential benefits of insect- and cultured-meat-based printed food for society. However, their own priorities for food consumption choices centered more on the qualities of health, taste, and naturalness. We found that overall, few participants articulated interest in or support for consuming or serving 3D-printed food products made from cultured meat or insects. Most expressed their disquiet about the degree of processing cultured meat undergoes. It was considered to be “unnatural,” and therefore not fresh, potentially harmful, lacking taste or not nutritious. Most of the participants also expressed antipathy towards the idea of eating printed products containing insects. While such products were considered more “natural” and nutritious than cultured meat, the idea of eating insects was predominantly greeted with disgust. As these findings suggest, plans to use 3D printing technologies to render ingredients such as cultured meat and insects more acceptable and appealing to consumers in countries like Australia have major cultural barriers to overcome.",
keywords = "3D printing, Australia, consumers, cultured meat, entomophagy, food, promissory narratives",
author = "Deborah LUPTON and Bethaney TURNER",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1080/07409710.2018.1531213",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "269--289",
journal = "Food and Foodways",
issn = "0740-9710",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Food of the Future? Consumer Responses to the Idea of 3D-Printed Meat and Insect-Based Foods. / LUPTON, Deborah; TURNER, Bethaney.

In: Food and Foodways, Vol. 26, No. 4, 27.12.2018, p. 269-289.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food of the Future? Consumer Responses to the Idea of 3D-Printed Meat and Insect-Based Foods

AU - LUPTON, Deborah

AU - TURNER, Bethaney

PY - 2018/12/27

Y1 - 2018/12/27

N2 - 3D printing technologies are beginning to be employed to fabricate new food products. One of the more unusual and potentially controversial adoptions of this novel food technology involves the use of laboratory-cultured meat or insect-based ingredients to support ethical consumption, food security, and environmental sustainability initiatives. In this article, we discuss findings from our study involving an online discussion group with Australian participants concerning their attitudes to a novel technology that combined new food processing and presentation devices (the 3D printer) with a range of ingredients. The participants recognized the potential benefits of insect- and cultured-meat-based printed food for society. However, their own priorities for food consumption choices centered more on the qualities of health, taste, and naturalness. We found that overall, few participants articulated interest in or support for consuming or serving 3D-printed food products made from cultured meat or insects. Most expressed their disquiet about the degree of processing cultured meat undergoes. It was considered to be “unnatural,” and therefore not fresh, potentially harmful, lacking taste or not nutritious. Most of the participants also expressed antipathy towards the idea of eating printed products containing insects. While such products were considered more “natural” and nutritious than cultured meat, the idea of eating insects was predominantly greeted with disgust. As these findings suggest, plans to use 3D printing technologies to render ingredients such as cultured meat and insects more acceptable and appealing to consumers in countries like Australia have major cultural barriers to overcome.

AB - 3D printing technologies are beginning to be employed to fabricate new food products. One of the more unusual and potentially controversial adoptions of this novel food technology involves the use of laboratory-cultured meat or insect-based ingredients to support ethical consumption, food security, and environmental sustainability initiatives. In this article, we discuss findings from our study involving an online discussion group with Australian participants concerning their attitudes to a novel technology that combined new food processing and presentation devices (the 3D printer) with a range of ingredients. The participants recognized the potential benefits of insect- and cultured-meat-based printed food for society. However, their own priorities for food consumption choices centered more on the qualities of health, taste, and naturalness. We found that overall, few participants articulated interest in or support for consuming or serving 3D-printed food products made from cultured meat or insects. Most expressed their disquiet about the degree of processing cultured meat undergoes. It was considered to be “unnatural,” and therefore not fresh, potentially harmful, lacking taste or not nutritious. Most of the participants also expressed antipathy towards the idea of eating printed products containing insects. While such products were considered more “natural” and nutritious than cultured meat, the idea of eating insects was predominantly greeted with disgust. As these findings suggest, plans to use 3D printing technologies to render ingredients such as cultured meat and insects more acceptable and appealing to consumers in countries like Australia have major cultural barriers to overcome.

KW - 3D printing

KW - Australia

KW - consumers

KW - cultured meat

KW - entomophagy

KW - food

KW - promissory narratives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059486413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/food-future-consumer-responses-idea-3dprinted-meat-insectbased-foods

U2 - 10.1080/07409710.2018.1531213

DO - 10.1080/07409710.2018.1531213

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 269

EP - 289

JO - Food and Foodways

JF - Food and Foodways

SN - 0740-9710

IS - 4

ER -