Forensic analysis of explosives using isotopte ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) - Part 2: forensic inter-laboratory trial: bulk carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in a range of chemical compounds (Australia and New Zealand)

Sarah Benson, Chris Lennard, Philip Maynard, David Hill, Anita Andrew, Ken Neal, Hilary Stuart-Williams, Janet Hope, G. Stewart Walker, Claude Roux

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparability of data over time and between laboratories is a key issue for consideration in the development of global databases, and more broadly for quality assurance in general. One mechanism that can be utilized for evaluating traceability is an inter‐laboratory trial. This paper addresses an inter‐laboratory trial conducted across a number of Australian and New Zealand isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) laboratories. The main objective of this trial was to determine whether IRMS laboratories in these countries would record comparable values for the distributed samples. Four carbon containing and four nitrogen containing compounds were distributed to seven laboratories in Australia and one in New Zealand. The laboratories were requested to analyze the samples using their standard procedures. The data from each laboratory was evaluated collectively using International Standard ISO 13528 (Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter‐laboratory comparisons). “Warning signals” were raised against one participant in this trial. “Action signals” requiring corrective action were raised against four participants. These participants reviewed the data and possible sources for the discrepancies. This inter‐laboratory trial was successful in providing an initial snapshot of the potential for traceability between the participating laboratories. The statistical methods described in this article could be used as a model for others needing to evaluate stable isotope results derived from multiple laboratories, e.g., inter‐laboratory trials/proficiency testing. Ongoing trials will be conducted to improve traceability across the Australian and New Zealand IRMS community
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)205-212
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Forensic Sciences
Volume55
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Nitrogen Isotopes
New Zealand
Mass Spectrometry
Carbon
Isotopes
Nitrogen Compounds
Information Storage and Retrieval
Databases

Cite this

Benson, Sarah ; Lennard, Chris ; Maynard, Philip ; Hill, David ; Andrew, Anita ; Neal, Ken ; Stuart-Williams, Hilary ; Hope, Janet ; Walker, G. Stewart ; Roux, Claude. / Forensic analysis of explosives using isotopte ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) - Part 2: forensic inter-laboratory trial: bulk carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in a range of chemical compounds (Australia and New Zealand). In: Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2010 ; Vol. 55, No. 1. pp. 205-212.
@article{87da41d184274d8ba1eddb7029962f00,
title = "Forensic analysis of explosives using isotopte ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) - Part 2: forensic inter-laboratory trial: bulk carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in a range of chemical compounds (Australia and New Zealand)",
abstract = "Comparability of data over time and between laboratories is a key issue for consideration in the development of global databases, and more broadly for quality assurance in general. One mechanism that can be utilized for evaluating traceability is an inter‐laboratory trial. This paper addresses an inter‐laboratory trial conducted across a number of Australian and New Zealand isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) laboratories. The main objective of this trial was to determine whether IRMS laboratories in these countries would record comparable values for the distributed samples. Four carbon containing and four nitrogen containing compounds were distributed to seven laboratories in Australia and one in New Zealand. The laboratories were requested to analyze the samples using their standard procedures. The data from each laboratory was evaluated collectively using International Standard ISO 13528 (Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter‐laboratory comparisons). “Warning signals” were raised against one participant in this trial. “Action signals” requiring corrective action were raised against four participants. These participants reviewed the data and possible sources for the discrepancies. This inter‐laboratory trial was successful in providing an initial snapshot of the potential for traceability between the participating laboratories. The statistical methods described in this article could be used as a model for others needing to evaluate stable isotope results derived from multiple laboratories, e.g., inter‐laboratory trials/proficiency testing. Ongoing trials will be conducted to improve traceability across the Australian and New Zealand IRMS community",
author = "Sarah Benson and Chris Lennard and Philip Maynard and David Hill and Anita Andrew and Ken Neal and Hilary Stuart-Williams and Janet Hope and Walker, {G. Stewart} and Claude Roux",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01242.x",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "205--212",
journal = "Journal of forensic Science",
issn = "0022-1198",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Forensic analysis of explosives using isotopte ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) - Part 2: forensic inter-laboratory trial: bulk carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in a range of chemical compounds (Australia and New Zealand). / Benson, Sarah; Lennard, Chris; Maynard, Philip; Hill, David; Andrew, Anita; Neal, Ken; Stuart-Williams, Hilary; Hope, Janet; Walker, G. Stewart; Roux, Claude.

In: Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2010, p. 205-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forensic analysis of explosives using isotopte ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) - Part 2: forensic inter-laboratory trial: bulk carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in a range of chemical compounds (Australia and New Zealand)

AU - Benson, Sarah

AU - Lennard, Chris

AU - Maynard, Philip

AU - Hill, David

AU - Andrew, Anita

AU - Neal, Ken

AU - Stuart-Williams, Hilary

AU - Hope, Janet

AU - Walker, G. Stewart

AU - Roux, Claude

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Comparability of data over time and between laboratories is a key issue for consideration in the development of global databases, and more broadly for quality assurance in general. One mechanism that can be utilized for evaluating traceability is an inter‐laboratory trial. This paper addresses an inter‐laboratory trial conducted across a number of Australian and New Zealand isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) laboratories. The main objective of this trial was to determine whether IRMS laboratories in these countries would record comparable values for the distributed samples. Four carbon containing and four nitrogen containing compounds were distributed to seven laboratories in Australia and one in New Zealand. The laboratories were requested to analyze the samples using their standard procedures. The data from each laboratory was evaluated collectively using International Standard ISO 13528 (Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter‐laboratory comparisons). “Warning signals” were raised against one participant in this trial. “Action signals” requiring corrective action were raised against four participants. These participants reviewed the data and possible sources for the discrepancies. This inter‐laboratory trial was successful in providing an initial snapshot of the potential for traceability between the participating laboratories. The statistical methods described in this article could be used as a model for others needing to evaluate stable isotope results derived from multiple laboratories, e.g., inter‐laboratory trials/proficiency testing. Ongoing trials will be conducted to improve traceability across the Australian and New Zealand IRMS community

AB - Comparability of data over time and between laboratories is a key issue for consideration in the development of global databases, and more broadly for quality assurance in general. One mechanism that can be utilized for evaluating traceability is an inter‐laboratory trial. This paper addresses an inter‐laboratory trial conducted across a number of Australian and New Zealand isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) laboratories. The main objective of this trial was to determine whether IRMS laboratories in these countries would record comparable values for the distributed samples. Four carbon containing and four nitrogen containing compounds were distributed to seven laboratories in Australia and one in New Zealand. The laboratories were requested to analyze the samples using their standard procedures. The data from each laboratory was evaluated collectively using International Standard ISO 13528 (Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by inter‐laboratory comparisons). “Warning signals” were raised against one participant in this trial. “Action signals” requiring corrective action were raised against four participants. These participants reviewed the data and possible sources for the discrepancies. This inter‐laboratory trial was successful in providing an initial snapshot of the potential for traceability between the participating laboratories. The statistical methods described in this article could be used as a model for others needing to evaluate stable isotope results derived from multiple laboratories, e.g., inter‐laboratory trials/proficiency testing. Ongoing trials will be conducted to improve traceability across the Australian and New Zealand IRMS community

U2 - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01242.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01242.x

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 205

EP - 212

JO - Journal of forensic Science

JF - Journal of forensic Science

SN - 0022-1198

IS - 1

ER -