Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Canberra Research Portal Home
Home
Profiles
Research output
Projects
Press/Media
Activities
Research units
Prizes
Student theses
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Forensic Scientists' conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report users?
Loene Howes
, Paul Kirkbride
,
Sally KELTY
, Roberta Julian
, Nenagh Kemp
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
31
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic Scientists' conclusions: How readable are they for non-scientist report users?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Forensic Expert
100%
Nonscientist
100%
Readability
57%
Expert Opinion
28%
Expert Reports
28%
Lawyers
14%
Tertiary Education
14%
Further Analysis
14%
Decision Aid
14%
Criminal Justice System
14%
Proficiency Testing
14%
Science Experts
14%
Ethical Responsibility
14%
Grade Level
14%
University Undergraduates
14%
Flesch Reading Ease
14%
Forensic Glass Analysis
14%
Active Voice
14%
Descriptive Characteristics
14%
Sentence Structure
14%
Scientific Integrity
14%
Text Structure
14%
Social Sciences
Scientists
100%
Mission Reports
20%
Criminal Justice System
10%
Police
10%