Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different

Ian Morgan, Regan ASHBY, Deborah Nickla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-361
Number of pages7
JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Myopia
Lenses
Research Personnel

Cite this

Morgan, Ian ; ASHBY, Regan ; Nickla, Deborah. / Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different. In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2013 ; Vol. 33, No. 3. pp. 355-361.
@article{84820fb3e2464948b4c01b4eb9045418,
title = "Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different",
abstract = "In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors",
keywords = "Visual Neuroscience",
author = "Ian Morgan and Regan ASHBY and Deborah Nickla",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/opo.12059",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "355--361",
journal = "British Journal of Physiological Optics",
issn = "0275-5408",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different. / Morgan, Ian; ASHBY, Regan; Nickla, Deborah.

In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2013, p. 355-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Form deprivation and lens-induced myopia: are they different

AU - Morgan, Ian

AU - ASHBY, Regan

AU - Nickla, Deborah

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors

AB - In the following point-counterpoint article, internationally-acclaimed myopia researchers were challenged to defend the two opposing sides of the topic defined by the title; their contributions, which appear in the order Point followed by Counterpoint, were peer-reviewed by both the editorial team and an external reviewer. Independently of the invited authors, the named member of the editorial team provided an Introduction and Summary, both of which were reviewed by the other members of the editorial team. By their nature, views expressed in each section of the Point-Counterpoint article are those of the author concerned and may not reflect the views of all of the authors

KW - Visual Neuroscience

U2 - 10.1111/opo.12059

DO - 10.1111/opo.12059

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 355

EP - 361

JO - British Journal of Physiological Optics

JF - British Journal of Physiological Optics

SN - 0275-5408

IS - 3

ER -