Framing up the “Stretching” of Co-Management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Collaborative management, or co-management, is recognized as best practice for protected area management. A vast literature explores the benefits and challenges of implementing co-management, but more literature is not always better. We propose that the term co-management has been uncritically “stretched”, losing its original framing of actors working together collaboratively. Co-management has become a facade under which traditional hierarchical and market-based management regimes can occur. Conceptual stretching inhibits the capacity to critically articulate variations within models of collaborative governance. We investigate this stretching through a nuanced framework of co-management models with varying intensities. By considering participating actors, institutions and delivery objectives, the theoretically informed and empirically tested framework highlights the stretched implementation of co-management, enabling protected area managers an opportunity to align their practice with the promise of co-management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-381
Number of pages19
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Framing up the “Stretching” of Co-Management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this