TY - JOUR
T1 - Framing up the “Stretching” of Co-Management
AU - Pearson, Leonie J.
AU - Dare, Melanie (Lain)
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is partially supported by Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis seed funding and the Murray-Darling Basin Futures Research and is supported through the Australian Government’s Collaborative Research Networks (CRN) Program.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2019/4/3
Y1 - 2019/4/3
N2 - Collaborative management, or co-management, is recognized as best practice for protected area management. A vast literature explores the benefits and challenges of implementing co-management, but more literature is not always better. We propose that the term co-management has been uncritically “stretched”, losing its original framing of actors working together collaboratively. Co-management has become a facade under which traditional hierarchical and market-based management regimes can occur. Conceptual stretching inhibits the capacity to critically articulate variations within models of collaborative governance. We investigate this stretching through a nuanced framework of co-management models with varying intensities. By considering participating actors, institutions and delivery objectives, the theoretically informed and empirically tested framework highlights the stretched implementation of co-management, enabling protected area managers an opportunity to align their practice with the promise of co-management.
AB - Collaborative management, or co-management, is recognized as best practice for protected area management. A vast literature explores the benefits and challenges of implementing co-management, but more literature is not always better. We propose that the term co-management has been uncritically “stretched”, losing its original framing of actors working together collaboratively. Co-management has become a facade under which traditional hierarchical and market-based management regimes can occur. Conceptual stretching inhibits the capacity to critically articulate variations within models of collaborative governance. We investigate this stretching through a nuanced framework of co-management models with varying intensities. By considering participating actors, institutions and delivery objectives, the theoretically informed and empirically tested framework highlights the stretched implementation of co-management, enabling protected area managers an opportunity to align their practice with the promise of co-management.
KW - Australia
KW - collaborative management
KW - environmental governance
KW - natural resource management
KW - protected areas
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060090022&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1544677
DO - 10.1080/08941920.2018.1544677
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85060090022
SN - 1521-0723
VL - 32
SP - 363
EP - 381
JO - Society and Natural Resources
JF - Society and Natural Resources
IS - 4
ER -